SpikeSpiegel
15 Mar 2004, 11:46 PM
Hi!
I did some testing with a "new" deinterlace filter for Avisynth:
TomsMoComp (www.trbarry.com)
It uses motion compensation and adaptive processing (like SmartDeinterlace), it doesn't change frame rate and resolution, it's fast and easy-to-use (only 2 parameters)
I compared it with some Bob-like filters (DG,Smart), SmartDeinterlace (VD, blend and interpolate methods), "single field method" and "half resolution method" using a DV file and 2vobs (a really-bad-interlaced music video and a chapter of a movie), so the results are:
-in hi-low motion scenes TMC is the best: no deint.-scaline artefacts, no one "mice teeth" visible, pictures are sharp.
-in static scenes the definition is really high, even enabling the "vertical filter"; if the source quality is almost perfect, with SmartDeinterlace (if you can find the right parameters) you can get better results.
-fluidity is quite good, considering the fact that it doesn't double the frame rate (unlike Bob)
The syntax is:
TomsMoComp(-1,SearchEffort,VerticalFilter)
"-1" means that it will be automatically revealed if the file is TopFieldFirst or not, if it doesn't work 0=false, 1=true.
SearchEffort: -1 to 30; with -1 the filter just doubles the vertical resolution, 0 is like a smarter Bob (bad), values of 1 to 30 are "normal" and are referred to the strength of the filter; i prefer 1-5.
VerticalFilter: 1=on 0=off; it reduces flickering and artifacts, very useful for DivX compression
Let me know what you think about it!
P.S. Does anybody know why isn't possible to change the title of a thread?
I did some testing with a "new" deinterlace filter for Avisynth:
TomsMoComp (www.trbarry.com)
It uses motion compensation and adaptive processing (like SmartDeinterlace), it doesn't change frame rate and resolution, it's fast and easy-to-use (only 2 parameters)
I compared it with some Bob-like filters (DG,Smart), SmartDeinterlace (VD, blend and interpolate methods), "single field method" and "half resolution method" using a DV file and 2vobs (a really-bad-interlaced music video and a chapter of a movie), so the results are:
-in hi-low motion scenes TMC is the best: no deint.-scaline artefacts, no one "mice teeth" visible, pictures are sharp.
-in static scenes the definition is really high, even enabling the "vertical filter"; if the source quality is almost perfect, with SmartDeinterlace (if you can find the right parameters) you can get better results.
-fluidity is quite good, considering the fact that it doesn't double the frame rate (unlike Bob)
The syntax is:
TomsMoComp(-1,SearchEffort,VerticalFilter)
"-1" means that it will be automatically revealed if the file is TopFieldFirst or not, if it doesn't work 0=false, 1=true.
SearchEffort: -1 to 30; with -1 the filter just doubles the vertical resolution, 0 is like a smarter Bob (bad), values of 1 to 30 are "normal" and are referred to the strength of the filter; i prefer 1-5.
VerticalFilter: 1=on 0=off; it reduces flickering and artifacts, very useful for DivX compression
Let me know what you think about it!
P.S. Does anybody know why isn't possible to change the title of a thread?