View Full Version : Newer versions of ffdshow can't be install
O-pos
29 Aug 2006, 07:33 PM
Hi!
After reinstalling Win98 SE on my computer, I can install only old ffdshow (2005 or older), because newer ones don't install. While installing I get the message "couldn't register ffdshow.ax" and then the installation stops. There are some ffdshows which install but after I try to open video file, I get the message "program has performed an illegal operation and will be shut down". What should I do? I'd stick with older ffdshow, but it can't open some new fideo files. Maybe certain program compoment is missng? However, DirectX is the latest.
Any suggestions?:evilidea:
O_pos
soup
29 Aug 2006, 08:46 PM
I can only tell you about my experience with the same problem a while ago. I have Net Defense Firewall with System Suite 5 & what I found out was that the firewall was interfering. So after I downloaded the update & saved in My Installs folder, I then disabled my firewall & installed to my c: drive program files.
anonymez
30 Aug 2006, 08:17 AM
install http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=32BC1BEE-A3F9-4C13-9C99-220B62A191EE&displaylang=en
and try again http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/7017/smile6ku.gif
O-pos
30 Aug 2006, 04:12 PM
I'll try and will get back to you
Thanks:)
O-pos
1 Sep 2006, 09:26 PM
I tried with Microsoft Visual C++ but it doesns't work, the same problem with ffdshow.ax - either "couldn't register ffdshow.ax", org after installation or "program has performed an illegal operation and will be shut down"-when I clock on details, again "ffdshow.ax has requested that.. "
Maybe Microsoft Visual C++ didn't install well? I have an impression that it's just extracting somewhere instead of installing (like it's the case with directX), the installer disappears automatically at the end and I can't find where the files did go.
I have no firewall or other defence system except Antivir
:evilidea: Any suggestions?
anonymez
2 Sep 2006, 06:05 AM
get the latest build from http://x264.nl
IIRC certain builds had a dependency on msvcr71.dll, guess you could download and copy into your sys32 dir
celtic_druid
3 Sep 2006, 03:08 PM
Easy enough to check what dependancies a file has. Is anyone doing builds with MSVC 7.1? Mix of ICL9.1, gcc and MSVC 2005 I would think. You might want to try a build from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/ffdshow-tryout
Also don't use SSE2. etc. builds if your CPU doesn't support it.
anonymez
3 Sep 2006, 03:16 PM
Is anyone doing builds with MSVC 7.1?
FFDShow 2006-09-01 (rev. 2546) MMX* was compiled by clsid using MSVC 7.1 (ffdshow.ax, etc)
http://www.free-codecs.com/download/FFDShow.htm
O-pos
12 Sep 2006, 12:24 AM
I don't understand any word from that what you said but still, first of all what I did was that I checked x264.nl and fre-codecs.com ffdshows, but it doesn't change anything. I don't know what is build, but I'll try out.
I also kept old file ffdshow.ax and after installing newer version of ffdshow, I replaced the ffdshow.ax file with old one, and then some video files really worked, but with the others pmc reported problem with other ffdshow file, but not .ax
O-pos
13 Sep 2006, 07:24 PM
Hi guys,
Well, I've solved it ::p
I tried ffdshows from celtic druid's link http://sourceforge.net/projects/ffdshow-tryout and that file:
<TABLE id=frelease cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 summary="Latest file listings for the Gaim project" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>ffdshow: clsid builds (http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=173941&package_id=199416)</TD><TD>generic builds (http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=173941&package_id=199416&release_id=439904)</TD><TD>September 11, 2006</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
worked well and solved every problem.
Could you tell me what was the problem? I presume it has something to do with the ending "clsid", but I don't know more:acid:
So Thanks again for your help, I really appreciate it.
O-pos
anonymez
13 Sep 2006, 07:27 PM
Could you tell me what was the problem?
probably
Also don't use SSE2. etc. builds if your CPU doesn't support it.
celtic_druid
14 Sep 2006, 04:34 PM
clsid is the person who compiled the builds. More important would be "generic" which means SSE/SSE2 are not required. Also there was an update to the installer recently to do with runtime dependencies.
O-pos
19 Sep 2006, 01:13 AM
Thanks for your answer. Maybe that's the right answer, because no SSE worked on my old machine..
Thanks again :)
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.