Digital Video Forums

Go Back   Digital Video Forums > General > Latest News

LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 4 Apr 2017, 04:18 PM   #1
admin's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,505
Default Streaming Now Accounts for Majority of Music Industry's Income, up 11% in 2016

For the first time ever, streaming now accounts for the majority of the music industry's income, at least in the United States. The tremendous growth seen by music streaming has also helped the music industry post the biggest yearly growth since 1998.

Including but not limited to Spotify, Pandora, Apple Music and YouTube, streaming accounted for 51% of music revenue in the U.S., bringing the total to US$7.7 billion for 2016. This is a 11 percent jump from the previous year, the biggest growth since 1998, at the height of music CD sales.

Music industry revenue is still down compared to that time though, with the current numbers only half of what it used to be. This is largely attributed to the changing buying habits of music fans, going from buying albums to much less expensive individual tracks.

Music subscription services, such as Spotify, accounted for most of the revenue growth. Almost 23 million users in the U.S. now subscribe to some kind of music streaming service, accounting for a third of all music sales.

But even with this set of stellar results, many in the music industry are still unhappy with the revenue sharing deal with Spotify, and in particularly the current situation with YouTube.

The music industry's copyright lobby, the RIAA, says the payout for streams on YouTube is only a fraction of what they would get from the likes of Apple Music or Spotify. The RIAA says that lax copyright laws are to blame, and has accused YouTube and parent company Google of profiting from piracy.

Current copyright laws protect Internet sites like YouTube from being liable for user uploaded content as long as the site has an active and workable way for rights-holder to identify and remove copyrighted works. The RIAA says this is not enough, as it places the onus on rights-holders to find and remove pirated content.

The RIAA argues that due to the widespread availability of pirated works on YouTube reduces the negotiating power of record labels when it comes to licensing deals.

YouTube argues that only rights-holders are capable of identifying which works belongs to them, and that YouTube has already gone beyond what's required to implement Content ID, an industry leading automated piracy scanning engine that can either remove pirated content, or pay rights-holders for any ad revenue earned from the pirated uploads. YouTube says they have already paid rights-holders more than $1 billion in fees in 2016 alone.

[via The Age, Medium]
Visit Digital Digest and, My Blog

Last edited by admin; 4 Apr 2017 at 04:29 PM
admin is offline   Reply With Quote


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
YouTube To Music Industry: Stop Blaming Us admin Latest News 0 8 Dec 2016 12:21 PM
Music Industry: Copyright Laws Don't Go Far Enough admin Latest News 0 10 Nov 2011 06:00 PM
Music Industry Wants LimeWire To Pay $75 Trillion In Damages admin Latest News 1 25 Mar 2011 07:13 AM
Music Industry Says ISP Can Profit From Online Music Sales admin Latest News 0 9 Mar 2010 02:27 PM
Are downloads really killing the music industry? Or is it something else? admin Latest News 1 15 Jun 2009 01:20 PM

All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:46 PM.

Kirsch designed by Andrew & Austin

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright © 1999 - 2011 Digital Digest

Visit DivXLand   Visit