![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Always learning
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: midwest-usa
Posts: 490
|
I recently purchased and installed Nero 8 on my wife's new HP Slimline PC with dual processors. When she uses Nero Recode to put videos on her iPod, I expected with the faster processor (two of them no less) that it would be blazing. In reality it will take over two hours to recode a 2 hour movie.
My personal PC with Nero 7 and only one processor smokes compared to my wife's system. I have checked her DMA settings (actually had to go into system setup to check DMA settings in this HP/Vista OS. Couldn't see anything under Device Manager) and it is correctly set for DMA. Any ideas appreciated.
__________________
APOD |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Super Moderator
![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: millenium falcon
Posts: 18,973
|
even in pio mode you will be reading or writting at 1 MB/s about an hour for a single layer dvd
sure she's got enough ram for vista and nero 8? what model of HP slimline? |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Always learning
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: midwest-usa
Posts: 490
|
It's an HP s3200t running 2 Gb of ram.
Sorry, I'm not following your comment about running in PIO mode. I just can't figure out why my older slower PC would do recoding much faster. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Super Moderator
![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: millenium falcon
Posts: 18,973
|
is her dual core using both cores at 100% with recode? task manager?
being in pio mode vs dma would only limit you to an hour or so time vista sucks and I am sure that HP could crap it down even further |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Junior Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1
|
Had exactly the same issues.
Loaded Nero 8 on 1 computer Kept Nero 7 on other Same file Encoded way faster on Nero 7. Then loaded Nero 8 to the computer where Nero 7 outpaced Nero 8. Encoding way slower on previously faster computer. Difference? Nero 8 Checked the settings Tried various permutations Found a solution in the Profile Default Profile is Nero AVC Changed it to Nero Standard and Voila, worked closer to the performance of Nero 7. Still a little slower but waaaaay better |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Junior Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1
|
I had the same experience: Shifting from AVC to Nero Standard reduced my compile time by a factor of 10 or more. What gives? AVC is supposed to be the newer and better CODEC.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Junior Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1
|
I have a Dual Core 2 2.0GHz 4GB Ram and have just decided to try Recode 3 after using AutoGK.
AutoGK can render on average a 2-pass HQ encode to Xvid on my system in less than 1hr 30mins. with Nero's Recode 3 to AVC takes almost 4hrs. Looks like I'll need to put off H.264/AVC untill I find a faster program. I always thought that Nero Recode was meant to be one of the fastest 2-pass encoders.Very dissapointed I haven't tried the older versions though. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Junior Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1
|
hmm odd it takes around 1 hour and 40ish mins to encode my 1 hour and 46 minute movie using Nero 8 set to AVC Cinema 2Pass High Quality on my Core 2 8400 @ 3Ghz.
I'm encoding right now, and it has taken around 20 minutes to run through the first pass and has dropped back to around 30frames on the second pass. |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Nero Burning Slow Help Please!!! | dolomite41 | Nero Recode | 5 | 7 Jan 2008 03:57 PM |
| nero 7 recoding trouble | chaotickicker | Nero Recode | 1 | 29 Mar 2007 01:54 AM |
| Nero recode not recoding the whole film!!!! | bananman | Nero Recode | 1 | 25 Aug 2006 01:40 AM |