Say No To George War Bush!!!!

[onynx]

Isnt it wonderful that our beloved neighbours are willing to guive out 30billion $$ to Turkish government, pay 300 000 soldiers for a prolonged vacation in the persian gulf, in order to "liberate" a nation who wishes to be left alone? Aint W. Bush a good person? church should have a sort of nobel prize for kind and caring people like him. look at all he has acheived, he has defined an "axis of evil", he is leading a war on the evil terrorists and above all, he is willing to "donate" a substantial part of other peoples money to "liberate" an oppressed people (just like robinhood). Maybe they should Canonize him. let us all kneel before Saint W.Bush...

ARGHHHHH STOP THIS MASCARADE!!!!!

[Batman]

I agree.

Sadly, on one seems able to stop the US military machine and a war on Iraq is all but a foregone conclusion

[onynx]

would it only be Iraq.....

[gd_nimrod]

Bush is a crack-head of a president who couldn't lead his country to victory if he had a map. 'Nuff said.

[Batman]

I'm worried for the War on Iraq, but what comes afterwards is even more upsetting. In fact, George W Bush may be a little better than Saddam Hussein. Will the US stop after Iraq? I doubt it. Will they bring democracy to Iraq or replace Saddam with their own buddy (in the 1980's Saddam was a US ally and supplied with chemical weapons). Will this campaign destablize the entire region? So many questions...

[gd_nimrod]

Yes i see your point batman about how far will "dubyah" take this war, especially since im sure it won't stop at iraq, and korea is probably next with its damn nuclear weaopns.

Oh, and i knew about the whole hussein used to be an ally of the us thing; but then again, bin ladin used to help the fbi

[SKD_Tech]

Ya know I was a republican until he started talking about Iraq

[onynx]

Bush is after the oil, and that is no secret, but i think that with the advancement of fuel cell, this may be a dead end.

[SKD_Tech]

why do you say that (the fuel cell)?

[Batman]

A feul cell would not require oil.....so Bush and his warrors wouldn't have to wage war anymore.

[SKD_Tech]

How would that need no oil. Your tires move that need lubercation your tires need to be made that takes oil.. crap everything takes oil almost

[Enchanter]

Originally posted by onynx
Bush is after the oil, and that is no secret,

I have no doubts about it. That Saddam is a dangerous person and needs to be removed from his seat of power is just a protocol the president is more than happy to exploit and hold onto.

Originally posted by onynx

but i think that with the advancement of fuel cell, this may be a dead end.

Not really. In terms of wide-spread implementation and cost efficiency, the conventional fuel (which is the said oil) wins hands down.

I personally am against war, especially one launched by the very country that claims to want nothing more than peace in the world. However, seeing what has been happening and what has failed, I don't believe that war can be avoided. The US has deployed far too many troops and invested HUGE amount of money for this. There is no reason for them to turn back and forget about it all. Moreover, the US has blatantly turned a deaf ear to the UN regarding their demands to go for more diplomatic means. Something looks quite obvious, does not it?

[Batman]

The US is fully aware that Saddam is no threat. A recent CIA report suggested Iraq would only be a threat if attacked. Weapons inspectors have already identified that Saddam has no nuclear program. The US and its allies are confident that this will be a short and easy war that's why its being fought. Oil is the major factor in this war. US is already working hard to make sure Iraqi oil is on sale after Gulf War II. It's so obvious, and no one is trying to hide that fact.

War will probably be happening soon....before summer (intense heat). It would be a big blow to morale, if hundreds of thousands of troops just had to go home.

[Enchanter]

Originally posted by Batman
The US is fully aware that Saddam is no threat. A recent CIA report suggested Iraq would only be a threat if attacked. Weapons inspectors have already identified that Saddam has no nuclear program.

That's interesting. I have never heard of that. Do you have the link to the news, Batman?

[Batman]

The CIA report which I mentioned in my previous post was reported here on national news (CBC: THE NATIONAL). I can't seem to find it online though. You might want to search google if you're very interested