CPU Utilisation of 3.11 & 4.x codecs

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Enchanter
    Old member
    • Feb 2002
    • 5417
    #1

    CPU Utilisation of 3.11 & 4.x codecs

    I've been wondering about this. Which if these codecs generally take more CPU cycles to process, assuming similar filesize & video resolution and same/no audio?

    I'll keep my own comments until I get further feedback.
    Tags: None
    • Wilbert
      Member
      Member
      • Nov 2001
      • 74
      #2
      I didn't make a good test comparison. But I can play my encoded divx 3.11 and 4.12 one pass without any problems (512x384). When I encode to 4.12 two pass (same resolution, zero post processing level) it doesn't play smooth.

      My system:

      Athlon 1.2 GHz (133 MHz), 384 MB, HDD WD 60 MB 7200 RPM. video: Asus 3800, 32 MB. Win98.

      Suggestions ???

        Comment

        • Enchanter
          Old member
          • Feb 2002
          • 5417
          #3
          I had no problems with either of my machines, be it my PIII800 or PIV1.8. However, I plan to lend the encodes to my friends, some of whom have computers below the 500MHz mark, so CPU utilisation becomes quite an important issue.

          My own comments will still be withheld until I get more response.

            Comment

            Previous template Next
            Working...