NeroRecode (of Nero 6) can't use for ISO output?

[jinjin_jp]

About newest NeroRecode(of Nero 6, I don't have Nero 7) ver2.2.6.17,
I befoe found the problem that show double layer even though single layer in log.
And now more significant problem about file arrangement like following,

*VTS_overviw
(1)original---I modified it to small size for saving test time.
PGC_1 (program chain): [Title(TTN): 1] [00:17:05.00 / 30 fps] (Programs: 10) (Cells: 10) (uses VOB-IDs: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7)
[Ch 01] [Pg 01] [Cell 01] [V/C Id: 1/ 1] : time: 00:04:12.00 / 30 fps
[Ch 02] [Pg 02] [Cell 02] [V/C Id: 1/ 2] : time: 00:04:33.18 / 30 fps
[Ch 03] [Pg 03] [Cell 03] [V/C Id: 1/ 3] : time: 00:03:51.22 / 30 fps
[Ch 04] [Pg 04] [Cell 04] [V/C Id: 1/ 4] : time: 00:04:24.20 / 30 fps
[Ch 05] [Pg 05] [Cell 05] [V/C Id: 2/ 1] Layer Br.: time: 00:00:00.15 / 30 fps
[Ch 06] [Pg 06] [Cell 06] [V/C Id: 3/ 1] Layer Br.: time: 00:00:00.15 / 30 fps
[Ch 07] [Pg 07] [Cell 07] [V/C Id: 4/ 1] Layer Br.: time: 00:00:00.15 / 30 fps
[Ch 08] [Pg 08] [Cell 08] [V/C Id: 5/ 1] Layer Br.: time: 00:00:00.15 / 30 fps
[Ch 09] [Pg 09] [Cell 09] [V/C Id: 6/ 1] Layer Br.: time: 00:00:00.15 / 30 fps
[Ch 10] [Pg 10] [Cell 10] [V/C Id: 7/ 1] Layer Br.: time: 00:00:00.15 / 30 fps
(2)output of NeroRecode(2.2.6.17)'s image file
PGC_1 (program chain): [Title(TTN): 1] [00:17:05.00 / 30 fps] (Programs: 10) (Cells: 11) (uses VOB-IDs: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7)
[Ch 01] [Pg 01] [Cell 01] [V/C Id: 1/ 1] : time: 00:04:12.00 / 30 fps
[Ch 02] [Pg 02] [Cell 02] [V/C Id: 1/ 2] : time: 00:04:33.18 / 30 fps
[Ch 03] [Pg 03] [Cell 03] [V/C Id: 1/ 3] : time: 00:03:51.22 / 30 fps
[Ch 04] [Pg 04] [Cell 04] [V/C Id: 1/ 4] : time: 00:01:08.18 / 30 fps
______________[Cell 05] [V/C Id: 1/ 5] Layer Br.: time: 00:03:16.02 / 30 fps
[Ch 05] [Pg 05] [Cell 06] [V/C Id: 2/ 1] Layer Br.: time: 00:00:00.15 / 30 fps
[Ch 06] [Pg 06] [Cell 07] [V/C Id: 3/ 1] Layer Br.: time: 00:00:00.15 / 30 fps
[Ch 07] [Pg 07] [Cell 08] [V/C Id: 4/ 1] Layer Br.: time: 00:00:00.15 / 30 fps
[Ch 08] [Pg 08] [Cell 09] [V/C Id: 5/ 1] Layer Br.: time: 00:00:00.15 / 30 fps
[Ch 09] [Pg 09] [Cell 10] [V/C Id: 6/ 1] Layer Br.: time: 00:00:00.15 / 30 fps
[Ch 10] [Pg 10] [Cell 11] [V/C Id: 7/ 1] Layer Br.: time: 00:00:00.15 / 30 fps
==>>It seems to mistake to make layer change which is no need because of single layer size.

*file arangement(confimed about each file by DVDDecrypter)
(1)image output of DVDShrink(3.2.0.15)
VIDEO_TS.IFO:276～278(6KB)
VIDEO_TS.BUP:279～281(6KB)
VTS_01_0.IFO:282～292(22KB)
VTS_01_1.VOB:293～524,579(1,048,574KB)
VTS_01_2.VOB:524,580～579,544(109,930KB)
VTS_01_0.BUP:579,545～579,555(22KB)
(2)image output of NeroRecode(2.2.6.17)
VIDEO_TS.IFO:544～546(6KB)
VIDEO_TS.BUP:560～562(6KB)
VTS_01_0.IFO:576～590(30KB)
VTS_01_1.VOB:592～524,878(1,048,574KB)
VTS_01_2.VOB:524,876～579,846(109,942KB)
VTS_01_0.BUP:579,847～579,861(30KB)
==>>files overlap in 1 places
==>>file size of VTS_01_0.IFO and BUP change bigger.(file/foleder output is same as original)

Is there any recommended version? Is it better to use a certain older ver.?

or is it better to use newest ver. with ignoring the problem of image output? (because generally newest ver.has less bug, and this problem is resolved by file output and burning ImgBurn's Build-mode.
But it is fact that Nero 6 is recommended to use older ver.6.6.0.18 )

Regards.

[jinjin_jp]

I tried with older ver.
After ver.2.1(2.2.6.16, 2.2.6.11, 2.2.6.09, 2.1.1.18), the results was same and bad.
Ver.2.0.0.18 was fixed the problems, but I don't want to use it because it doesn't have AEC(it correpnding to DVDShrink 3.1).
I'd use ver.2.2.6.17, but not use for image output as restriction, if not any other suggestions.

Regards.

[blutach]

Interesting jinjin_jp and great to see you again!

I do not think this should affect playing of the DVD. It simply seems the cell has been split. Of course, you would want all the "real" cells to play seamlessly.

EDIT: I see where the files overlap. This is very bad.

Regards

[jinjin_jp]

I do not think this should affect playing of the DVD. It simply seems the cell has been split. Of course, you would want all the "real" cells to play seamlessly.

In this example, I felt it was big problem, because it caseses pause in cell-splitted point even though music clip and unfavorable.

I see where the files overlap. This is very bad.

Oppositely, I didn't notice anything in file-overlapped point. But it is obviously illegal.

Regards.

[blutach]

Are you saying that the mux is bad so the new 1/4 and 1/5 do not play seamlessly? That would not be right either.

Regards

[jinjin_jp]

Yes, it is as you say.

Regards.