Codecs confusion, which codec is best?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • techno
    Digital Video Master
    Digital Video Master
    • Nov 2001
    • 1309

    #16
    lol...well, then move to msmpeg4 v2 then, AUTHERISED playback lol

    Comment

    • Batman
      Lord of Digital Video
      Lord of Digital Video
      • Jan 2002
      • 2317

      #17
      Doom9 has recently conducted thorough tests on many codecs. You may want to look at his results. Divx 3.11 alpha + Nandub still seems to be very good, though Divx 5.02 is very close, and possibly easier to use .

      Comment

      • Enchanter
        Old member
        • Feb 2002
        • 5417

        #18
        Wasn't it for the older (pre-5.02) version of DivX 5? It's been updated?

        Comment

        • UncasMS
          Super Moderator
          • Nov 2001
          • 9047

          #19
          if i remember correctly it has been updated.

          on the other hand what will a comparison like that be good for?


          you will only be able to see JPGs of certain scenes which does not at all be representative for the codecs abilities.

          then on the other hand you might read what someone else tells you.

          dont get me wrong folks, but make some testruns for yourself and then decide while being able to watch the real avi-output instead of some stills.

          Comment

          • MrSnail
            Junior Member
            Junior Member
            • Jun 2002
            • 45

            #20
            Originally posted by UncasMS
            any realease from major gorups you will find on the internet will be done with nandub, since they try to stick to some basic rules.
            I thought NanDub was a program

            Or is it?

            So what is the difference between using NanDub and DivX 5.02 if NanDub isn't a codec?

            I'm all confused now
            If at first you don't succeed, give up.

            Comment

            • Enchanter
              Old member
              • Feb 2002
              • 5417

              #21
              nandub is a modified version of Virtualdub, that allows 2-pass encoding with DivX 3.11a and MS MPEG4V2 (No other encoders are capable of this). On the other hand, 2-pass encoding with DivX 5.x (and DivX 4.x) can be done using most available encoders, including VirtualDub. You can't, however, use DivX 5 (or any other codecs) with nandub. nandub supports only the said DivX 3.11a and MS MPEG4V2.

              Comment

              • MrSnail
                Junior Member
                Junior Member
                • Jun 2002
                • 45

                #22
                O right - Thanks very much I get it now

                I'll have to do some experimenting with NanDub and 3.11a then.
                If at first you don't succeed, give up.

                Comment

                • Enchanter
                  Old member
                  • Feb 2002
                  • 5417

                  #23
                  Have fun. Don't forget to try out DivX 5.02 as well. Worth comparing against 3.11.

                  Comment

                  • LaFouine
                    Platinum Member
                    Platinum Member
                    • Dec 2001
                    • 194

                    #24
                    What do you all think of codec 4.12 ?
                    Rip In Peace
                    LaFouine

                    Comment

                    • Batman
                      Lord of Digital Video
                      Lord of Digital Video
                      • Jan 2002
                      • 2317

                      #25
                      The divx 5.02 codec was used in the tests, Enchanter Doom9 has conducted a very thorough test, indicating both the strengths and weaknesses of all codecs. Overall, while Doom9 implies the divx. 3.11 alpha is codec is actually "inferior", when used with Nandub it can produce brilliant results

                      Comment

                      • Enchanter
                        Old member
                        • Feb 2002
                        • 5417

                        #26
                        Strange. I can't find that article on Doom9. Can someone point me in the right direction? The last time I read that article was before 5.02 came out, so it's time to read the updates. Thanks.

                        @LaFouine,
                        I don't like the look of the DivX 4.x-compressed AVIs at all. Simply put, the colour looks washed out and not as sharp. I can't, for heaven's sake, understand why some decided to use that codec, instead of 3.11a/MS MPEG4 V2 at that time.

                        Comment

                        Working...