Hello everyone,
With diversity of the codecs, it is important to challenge itself.
Indeed, while taking this example:
VD 1.6 + mpeg4 avc (source X4 mpegable v2.2.7 live) and Mpegable X4 v2.2.7 live only.
One perceives very quickly that the statute of the final format is not the same. mpeg4 for VD and Mp4 for Mpegable X4 live
I think that there is of what to wonder. I don't even speak of profile them that provides Mpegable.
The VSS H.264 with VD1.6 generated the same format that VD under mpegable.
To the big difference, it is the quality that the VSS H.264 that changes delivers.
To finish, I think that the codec open Xvid source will hurt facing these new formats more and more competitive.
It will be the opportunity to make some tests: VD Xvid, VD mpegable, VD Vss H2.64,
What do you think?
With diversity of the codecs, it is important to challenge itself.
Indeed, while taking this example:
VD 1.6 + mpeg4 avc (source X4 mpegable v2.2.7 live) and Mpegable X4 v2.2.7 live only.
One perceives very quickly that the statute of the final format is not the same. mpeg4 for VD and Mp4 for Mpegable X4 live
I think that there is of what to wonder. I don't even speak of profile them that provides Mpegable.
The VSS H.264 with VD1.6 generated the same format that VD under mpegable.
To the big difference, it is the quality that the VSS H.264 that changes delivers.
To finish, I think that the codec open Xvid source will hurt facing these new formats more and more competitive.
It will be the opportunity to make some tests: VD Xvid, VD mpegable, VD Vss H2.64,
What do you think?
Comment