The men said their judge, Tomas Norstrom, left, had been biased against them because he belonged to several copyright lobby groups, but the court said it had found no evidence of bias.
Is the New York Times wrong?
This article seems to suggest they may be:
TPB defence wanted to claim bias against the judge, but the district court (the one that has tried the case) denies such claims and has said so to the appeals court, which has yet to rule - this is what the techdirt article states.
Does anybody know what's really going on? Cynthia?
Comment