Windows IDE or Intel IDE

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • techreactor
    Banned
    • Jul 2005
    • 1309

    Windows IDE or Intel IDE

    As you install Windows most probably your IDE bus is configured with the generic windows IDE driver (pciide.sys).

    But assuming you have an Intel MB, and you install the latest Chipset conf utility, you can change it to point to an intel driver (intelide.sys).

    Is the intel driver better option ????
  • anonymez
    Super Moderator
    • Mar 2004
    • 5525

    #2
    intel knows their own chipsets better than microsoft does
    "What were the things in Gremlins called?" - Karl Pilkington

    Comment

    • Chewy
      Super Moderator
      • Nov 2003
      • 18971

      #3
      Nvidia seems to thinks so too, over at cdfreaks atapi optical drives seem to like default microsift drivers, might be the forum, or the part of the world?

      The main issue I have found is many drivers were written for Xp then as
      service packs were released those drivers become obsolete or even
      problematic, see the implementation of USB2. Intel or any other chipset maker doesn't know windows as well as microsoft, hopefully they collaberate.

      It's also a question of have the drivers been WHQL tested.

      Comment

      • anonymez
        Super Moderator
        • Mar 2004
        • 5525

        #4
        manufacturer's drivers are updated more often and i'd imagine any issues regarding windows updates would have been ironed out. ofcourse this depends on the manufacturer. my own experience with intel chipset drivers is that they're quite good.

        but i agree with the nvidia part, they do have issues
        Last edited by anonymez; 10 Jan 2006, 09:58 PM.
        "What were the things in Gremlins called?" - Karl Pilkington

        Comment

        • Chewy
          Super Moderator
          • Nov 2003
          • 18971

          #5
          There are several instances of intel rollbacks on secondary ide drivers
          I have seen that eliminate issues with dvd burning, the IAA is the worst
          of all.
          Fortunately I have not had to deal with these issues recently.

          Another problem is lack of updated support by the motherboard manufacturers.

          The one thing Intel seems to have done is fully implement atapi/optical support
          in their serial chipset hardware/software?
          Last edited by Chewy; 10 Jan 2006, 10:06 PM.

          Comment

          • techreactor
            Banned
            • Jul 2005
            • 1309

            #6
            The "intelide.sys" driver is digitally signed by microsoft, infact its a release from microsoft only. Therefore I am sure it will work better than the generic "pciide.sys" driver by microsoft.

            Comment

            • Chewy
              Super Moderator
              • Nov 2003
              • 18971

              #7
              I would compare dates on the 2 drivers and go with the most recent.

              Comment

              • techreactor
                Banned
                • Jul 2005
                • 1309

                #8
                Originally Posted by Chewy
                I would compare dates on the 2 drivers and go with the most recent.
                Yes, thats what I did, there was a difference of 3 yrs, between the two and since it was present in the "Windows\system32\drivers" directory, I am sure the intelide.sys was part of the SP2 distribution by microsoft.

                Comment

                • Chewy
                  Super Moderator
                  • Nov 2003
                  • 18971

                  #9
                  then it's a nobrainer.
                  where did the
                  pciide.sys
                  come from?

                  Comment

                  • techreactor
                    Banned
                    • Jul 2005
                    • 1309

                    #10
                    Originally Posted by Chewy
                    then it's a nobrainer.
                    where did the come from?
                    From the OS install, pciide.sys is a generic driver for XP.

                    Comment

                    • Chewy
                      Super Moderator
                      • Nov 2003
                      • 18971

                      #11
                      I am sure the intelide.sys was part of the SP2 distribution by microsoft.
                      make up you mind, if it's sp2 then go with it over previous versions

                      Comment

                      • techreactor
                        Banned
                        • Jul 2005
                        • 1309

                        #12
                        Both are part of the SP's, the chipset utility is used just to point to it. See this .

                        Comment

                        • Chewy
                          Super Moderator
                          • Nov 2003
                          • 18971

                          #13
                          This problem was first corrected in Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2.
                          that link was for XP original(no service packs)

                          Comment

                          • techreactor
                            Banned
                            • Jul 2005
                            • 1309

                            #14
                            Yeah right!, but my system wasnt using intelide.sys even after SP2, so had to change it using the chipset utility.

                            Comment

                            • Chewy
                              Super Moderator
                              • Nov 2003
                              • 18971

                              #15
                              Just test, which does best?

                              Comment

                              Working...