help

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gonwk
    Lord of Digital Video
    Lord of Digital Video
    • Dec 2005
    • 1500

    help

    Hi Chewey,

    I have come across some 300Gig Maxtor with 16Meg Cache ... for $87 including tax ... I went crazy and bought me 5 ... I plan to use them as external drives ... I don't really need that many for moving files around ...

    Q: Do you know if they are dumping them because newer drives will become SATA? If so may be I should keep only couple and return the rest ... I have only 15 days from the date of purchase for a full refund!

    Thanks!
    G!
  • Chewy
    Super Moderator
    • Nov 2003
    • 18971

    #2
    that's a little extreme, I would just keep 2, I am reccomending e-serial for everyone with a new computer and extra serial ports. They are even sticking e-sata on mobos now.

    Comment

    • gonwk
      Lord of Digital Video
      Lord of Digital Video
      • Dec 2005
      • 1500

      #3
      THANKS Chewy.
      G!

      Comment

      • Chewy
        Super Moderator
        • Nov 2003
        • 18971

        #4
        choose the external cases carefully

        Comment

        • NightTran
          King of Digital Video
          King of Digital Video
          • Aug 2005
          • 4224

          #5
          5
          sigpic

          Comment

          • locoeng
            Who Farted?
            • Dec 2005
            • 2509

            #6
            That is over a terrabyte of storage, nice.


            "I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person. It's not fair to you and no challenge for us."
            Walt Kelly

            Comment

            • katzdvd
              Lord of Digital Video
              Lord of Digital Video
              • Feb 2006
              • 2198

              #7
              gonwk,
              <center>
              Bill Gates, Circa 1981: "640K ought to be enough for anybody"
              </center>


              katz

              Comment

              • locoeng
                Who Farted?
                • Dec 2005
                • 2509

                #8


                "I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person. It's not fair to you and no challenge for us."
                Walt Kelly

                Comment

                • Mike89
                  Digital Video Enthusiast
                  Digital Video Enthusiast
                  • May 2005
                  • 348

                  #9
                  Chewy. You gave me suggestions about Shrink outputting to a different hard drive.

                  Is there also a benefit if two hard drives (non SATA) are hooked up together on one IDE 80 pin cable?
                  I7 920 @ 3.5 gig (ThermalRight U120E 1366 RT Heatsink), Asus P6T, 3x1024 Corsair DDR3 1600, EVGA GTX 280, NEC 90GX2, X-Fi Xtreme Gamer Pro, Lite-on IHAS4228 SATA DVD R/W, Pioneer DVR-216D SATA DVD R/W, LG GH22NS30 SATA DVD R/W, 2 WD 640 gig (32 meg cache) SATA HDDs, WD 750 gig SATA External HDD (eSata), Winfast USB2 TV Tuner, Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Speaker System, Corsair TX750w PSU, HSPC Top Deck Tech Station, Windows XP Pro

                  Comment

                  • Chewy
                    Super Moderator
                    • Nov 2003
                    • 18971

                    #10
                    Even if drives share cables, things are faster because one drive is only being used for reads, the other only for writes, worst case scenario is a drive trying
                    to access data from one part for reads and write to another part at the same time. A 16 meg cache may burst at 133MB/s or 150MB/s(sata1), but we are talking gigabytes and newer drives do well to put out 40MB/s sustained transfers when reading or writting, not both.

                    windows does all this reading and writting when it boots up, a properly configured computer only loads
                    a few hundred megabytes to ram and page file.
                    Last edited by Chewy; 14 Aug 2006, 11:51 AM.

                    Comment

                    • Mike89
                      Digital Video Enthusiast
                      Digital Video Enthusiast
                      • May 2005
                      • 348

                      #11
                      Cool. Both my drives are on SATA so I already have separate cables. A friend of mine has two IDE Hard Drives on one 80 pin (master and slave) so I was wondering if he should do the separate drive thing too (Shrink outputting to different HDD from the one with the DVDD ripped files for those who didn't know what I was referring to). Thanks for the info.
                      I7 920 @ 3.5 gig (ThermalRight U120E 1366 RT Heatsink), Asus P6T, 3x1024 Corsair DDR3 1600, EVGA GTX 280, NEC 90GX2, X-Fi Xtreme Gamer Pro, Lite-on IHAS4228 SATA DVD R/W, Pioneer DVR-216D SATA DVD R/W, LG GH22NS30 SATA DVD R/W, 2 WD 640 gig (32 meg cache) SATA HDDs, WD 750 gig SATA External HDD (eSata), Winfast USB2 TV Tuner, Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Speaker System, Corsair TX750w PSU, HSPC Top Deck Tech Station, Windows XP Pro

                      Comment

                      • Chewy
                        Super Moderator
                        • Nov 2003
                        • 18971

                        #12
                        Mike,
                        I always rip to my system drive, actually a data partition, but in this case we will assume no partition. I let shrink output to another drive(hopefully on a seperate cable). After checking out the transcode I then delete the rip.
                        My object is to leave my system drive as clean as possible, windows and your programs love a clean well organized drive. Every few weeks I clean out the oldest movie files, but by then I have verified that the burns play fine.
                        Once in a blue moon I delete all video and defrag my data drive.

                        Comment

                        • katzdvd
                          Lord of Digital Video
                          Lord of Digital Video
                          • Feb 2006
                          • 2198

                          #13
                          a properly configured computer only loads
                          a few hundred megabytes to ram and page file.
                          what do you consider a "properly configured computer" - details please?

                          Comment

                          • Chewy
                            Super Moderator
                            • Nov 2003
                            • 18971

                            #14
                            a power user setup running/booting lean and mean

                            back when I first got into this video stuff, I read a guy's website about setting up a dedicated video machine, remember we were lucky to have 1 gigahertz cpu's, 256 megs of ram and small slow hard drives. He proposed
                            loading your computer, finding what programs and drivers/codecs worked best. Then reformatting and only loading what was absolutely necessary for video work, nothing else. These machines were standalone, no internet.
                            Today we take much more powerful machines and load them with so much crap they end up being no faster.

                            a good case in point is my current machine, my bench times have increased as I loaded ati catalyst drivers, microsoft net, and nero vision stuff and lord knows what else, I am getting ready for a clean install and takeing it back off the internet.
                            Last edited by Chewy; 14 Aug 2006, 08:27 PM.

                            Comment

                            • katzdvd
                              Lord of Digital Video
                              Lord of Digital Video
                              • Feb 2006
                              • 2198

                              #15
                              a good case in point is my current machine, my bench times have increased as I loaded ati catalyst drivers, microsoft net, and nero vision stuff and lord knows what else, I am getting ready for a clean install and takeing it back off the internet.
                              All good points; I understand where you are going with this. I too want to load & run a lean, mean, burnin' machine (don't we all)! My only problem is that it seems almost impossible to run a pc "standalone" off the net anymore, because of the continual upgrades needed for all the programs/ driver updates/ firmware/bios updates & so much more...

                              Tho, I guess you can always burn most of the updates to cd & transfer them over, or use a cable/wireless/other connection

                              Comment

                              Working...