Hello.
The general drift of the question is this: is there some limiting "data rate" that the divx file should end up having after encoding to ensure the CD or DVD drive will be capable of playback without stuttering? And if so, is there a good way to handle the tradeoff in picture quality?
Now here's the specifics:
I'm trying to take some of the video I shot with my Sony miniDV camcorder, encode it in Divx, and put it on a CD-R for sharing with other family members. I transferred and edited the video using Pinnacle Studio 7 and then output to an AVI file using the miroDV2AVI codec (this was Studio's default setting for "keeping the properties the same as the original footage" and I think the same codec was used in getting the video of the tape in the first place).
Anyway, I ended up with a 3.19Gb file with these properties (according to Windows XP):
image: 720x480
audio: Duration - 0:15:20
Bit Rate - 1024kbps
Sample size - 16bit
format - PCM
video: Frame rate - 29fps
sample size - 24bit
compression - miroDV2avi
I then began using Virtualdub several times to try to come up with a DivX file that my DVD drive could handle playing back without stuttering. Generally, I've been using a resize filter to knock the image down to 320x240 along with 2 passes of the Divx 5.02 pro codec and encoding the audio as a 96kbs mp3.
All other options being held constant, it seems that I have to keep reducing the bitrate in the Divx5 config to end up with a file that has a "data rate" (I thought these were the same thing) low enough for good playback on a CD-R. The problem is that lowering the bitrate like this seriously degrades the picture quality of the original file.
In the past, I've encoded a few DVDs of a television series using Gordian Knot with a selected bitrate around 800kbps. This resulted in Divx files that windows says have a data rate of about 125kbps and these files play just fine off a CD. The difference is, the ripped and encoded shows come out looking fine with this lower data rate, whereas my video does not.
Any help or advice would be sincerely appreciated. Oh, incidentally, I believe I do have DMA turned on already.
Thanks,
Morg
The general drift of the question is this: is there some limiting "data rate" that the divx file should end up having after encoding to ensure the CD or DVD drive will be capable of playback without stuttering? And if so, is there a good way to handle the tradeoff in picture quality?
Now here's the specifics:
I'm trying to take some of the video I shot with my Sony miniDV camcorder, encode it in Divx, and put it on a CD-R for sharing with other family members. I transferred and edited the video using Pinnacle Studio 7 and then output to an AVI file using the miroDV2AVI codec (this was Studio's default setting for "keeping the properties the same as the original footage" and I think the same codec was used in getting the video of the tape in the first place).
Anyway, I ended up with a 3.19Gb file with these properties (according to Windows XP):
image: 720x480
audio: Duration - 0:15:20
Bit Rate - 1024kbps
Sample size - 16bit
format - PCM
video: Frame rate - 29fps
sample size - 24bit
compression - miroDV2avi
I then began using Virtualdub several times to try to come up with a DivX file that my DVD drive could handle playing back without stuttering. Generally, I've been using a resize filter to knock the image down to 320x240 along with 2 passes of the Divx 5.02 pro codec and encoding the audio as a 96kbs mp3.
All other options being held constant, it seems that I have to keep reducing the bitrate in the Divx5 config to end up with a file that has a "data rate" (I thought these were the same thing) low enough for good playback on a CD-R. The problem is that lowering the bitrate like this seriously degrades the picture quality of the original file.
In the past, I've encoded a few DVDs of a television series using Gordian Knot with a selected bitrate around 800kbps. This resulted in Divx files that windows says have a data rate of about 125kbps and these files play just fine off a CD. The difference is, the ripped and encoded shows come out looking fine with this lower data rate, whereas my video does not.
Any help or advice would be sincerely appreciated. Oh, incidentally, I believe I do have DMA turned on already.
Thanks,
Morg
Comment