Plus Media

**NightTran** · 29 Apr 2006, 01:48 PM

that is a very good burn, just dont ever multitask why burning,

**VirgUSA** · 29 Apr 2006, 10:10 PM

Thanks. It is just the plus media that I have problems with. Guess I just need to stick to dash media. I have just been determined to make the plus media work.

**Gary D** · 29 Apr 2006, 10:37 PM

Nice.

Awesome burn VirgUSA. I would stick with the minus media too. I use my NEC 3550 to burn the plus and my LG4163 to burn the minuses.

**sonic_emperor** · 30 Apr 2006, 03:26 AM

so 84 is enough.or are there other things too look at?

**Gary D** · 30 Apr 2006, 03:47 AM

Is 84 enough?? Tough call. I aim for perfect but that will never happen to me!

84 will probably play with no problem except for a pixelization or two once or twice through a movie. I use to decrypt my movies at max speed. After this post, I thought if the reader is making that many errors at 16X compare to 8X, then slower is better. I thinks my next rips will be done at 4X. Remember GIGO!!! Garbage In = Garbage Out

cdspeed scan/any good? - Digital Video Forums

http://forum.digital-digest.com/showthread.php?postid=389847#post389847

prodiscRO416x -burned at 16x,why are the lines so jaged in the speed test,does it matter.?IS this a good burn ?If some you can explane would be a big help. Have liteon1635s yv6j

**MikeyBK** · 30 Apr 2006, 05:20 AM

Originally Posted by Gary D

GIGO!!! Garbage In = Garbage Out

That is so true! I had a home video with the crappiest quality ( digital camera .mov files converted to DVD) and burned them to a Verbatim and scanned them and got a score of 97 or 98%. I also scanned an extremely crisp quality video of a movie on those same Verbs and got a score which was less than 95% ?????

But as far as quality of the image, there is absolutely no comparison.
Scanning for video quality is almost an oxymoron statement!!

Plus Media

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment