Best disc for storing data?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NightTran
    King of Digital Video
    King of Digital Video
    • Aug 2005
    • 4224

    #16
    but what do you think Chewy? your opion count I gave away most of my verbatim even the one with the new pioneer I will give away too
    sigpic

    Comment

    • Chewy
      Super Moderator
      • Nov 2003
      • 18971

      #17
      night,
      I put more trust in yours and my scans and the poll at cdfreaks than that website, my last batch of verbatim had about 5 bad blanks in it ranging from disks that scanned 50 when burned to others that were bitsett and wouldn't play(but scanned a 95?)

      Before that I had 2 small batches that were excelent

      Comment

      • NightTran
        King of Digital Video
        King of Digital Video
        • Aug 2005
        • 4224

        #18
        Thanks for your input, let just say I will burn all mine media TY and YD until the BLURAY go really low
        sigpic

        Comment

        • Chewy
          Super Moderator
          • Nov 2003
          • 18971

          #19
          test a few of those new verbs, they might surprise you in the pioneer

          Comment

          • katzdvd
            Lord of Digital Video
            Lord of Digital Video
            • Feb 2006
            • 2198

            #20
            a weak 3rd and 4th
            how did I miss that? Must have scanned over it too fast! (Looking at the TY's!)

            @ night -
            verbatim is a show for scanning I had a few that scan really good but 6 months later it show less then 50% quality
            thanks for the info; I have approx. 100 Verb discs backed up, & since I date them all & record the scans, I will keep an eye on them, to see if I experience the same problem that you have after 6 + months.

            doesn't sound good...

            regards, katz

            Comment

            • NightTran
              King of Digital Video
              King of Digital Video
              • Aug 2005
              • 4224

              #21
              Some of the old verb I was burn with 1620, Nec 3550 and even with Plex so the final result now it is still from the verb itself, I think it will be here on thursday I will try out both new benq 55 and the Pioneer

              I will try to buy more Bneq 40 tomorow or wed when I check CompUSA

              Kat, I just swap them out now one buy one to TY or YD after they hit below 90
              Last edited by NightTran; 15 Aug 2006, 12:35 PM.
              sigpic

              Comment

              • Chewy
                Super Moderator
                • Nov 2003
                • 18971

                #22
                I have several older verbs that scan low, they have been handled some and
                since I didn't scan when they were burned, they probably would have been
                70-80QS when new. Verbatim had a lot of quality control problems when they
                started outsourcing their manufacturing but they are good grade A media now. Some studies have shown verbatims to do better in longevity than
                TY. Really a crap shoot.

                Comment

                • NightTran
                  King of Digital Video
                  King of Digital Video
                  • Aug 2005
                  • 4224

                  #23
                  Wonder if they got paid for those test , I dont save the scan but I wrote on the out side of each disc what was the quality scan was on what date then I rescan later that is when my blood presure go up
                  sigpic

                  Comment

                  • Chewy
                    Super Moderator
                    • Nov 2003
                    • 18971

                    #24
                    what were you scanning with? back then?

                    Comment

                    • NightTran
                      King of Digital Video
                      King of Digital Video
                      • Aug 2005
                      • 4224

                      #25
                      1620
                      sigpic

                      Comment

                      • Chewy
                        Super Moderator
                        • Nov 2003
                        • 18971

                        #26
                        the disks are going bad then, they were good scanners

                        Comment

                        • NightTran
                          King of Digital Video
                          King of Digital Video
                          • Aug 2005
                          • 4224

                          #27
                          I rarely scanning with lighton because it's too slow only 4x
                          sigpic

                          Comment

                          • joe113
                            Menu hater
                            • Feb 2005
                            • 368

                            #28
                            Just did a scan on a rw disc that I burned last January, I have a pic of the scan results, how do I get it in here?

                            Comment

                            • joe113
                              Menu hater
                              • Feb 2005
                              • 368

                              #29
                              The little attach file button does not work with firefox!
                              Attached Files

                              Comment

                              • joe113
                                Menu hater
                                • Feb 2005
                                • 368

                                #30
                                Scanning a third rw disc, so far so good, disc no. 2 was the same, 100% good. Can I safely say that the data is good with those results?

                                Comment

                                Working...