About recode.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fenrry
    Junior Member
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2005
    • 4

    About recode.



    Hello, I've been using Dvd Shrink, Dvd Decrypter and lately Dvd43 as add-in.

    I heard that Recode works faster than any of this programs above, is that true? besides, Recode is supposed to work only with unprotected dvd's so how 's that supposed to work faster than DVD Decrypter or the old faithfull DVD Srhrink ????

    Other thing I heard is that there is another program, even faster, it can rip and make copies of dvd's in less than 20 min's.

    Is it true or is just mere crap and I should stick to the very well known and respected available tools ?

    The other final thing, who's gonna take care of developing or keep working on tools like Dvd Shrink, since development was halted on both Shrink an Decrypter ??

    Fen
  • nwg
    Left *****
    • Jun 2003
    • 5196

    #2
    It's the compression that is faster.

    Other thing I heard is that there is another program, even faster, it can rip and make copies of dvd's in less than 20 min's.
    That program could be anything if it even exists. Anyway, it is going to take 30 minutes at 2x, 15 minutes at 4x, 7 minutes at 8x etc just to burn the DVD.

    No one will be further developing Shrink and probably not DVD Decrypter.

    Comment

    • Fenrry
      Junior Member
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2005
      • 4

      #3
      So Basically the rypping is the same speed but the recompresion when making the iso is faster?? and when burning is depending on the speed you choose to burn as always.

      Am I correct ?

      What about recode, how does it work?

      Comment

      • michi90
        Junior Member
        Junior Member
        • Jul 2005
        • 27

        #4
        There is no further development for Shrink, because this guy now works for Ahead (Nero Inc. or whatever).
        So Recode uses the same engine (speed optimized) for Transcoding DVD9 to DVD5.

        I think that Shrink is still more user friendly and easier to use than Recode.
        For example it is not possible to switch to 'maximum sharpness' in Recode.
        You have to go to the windows registry.
        read here:
        http://forum.digital-digest.com/showthread.php?t=50806#

        And there is a bug of unrecognised deepanalysis in Recode.
        read here:
        Hi guys, I've had a look and can't see anyone has asked this question! I am currently using DVD Shrink which seems to work well. Is Nero Recode any better than DVD Shrink? I see that DVD Shrink is no longer being developed so I was wondering if Recode is a better long term solution but am not sure of the difference in


        Or I've heard that some people have problems with the correct size if they create an ISO-Image (instead of folders).

        So no doubt about:
        Until now DVDShrink 3.2 is still the best (stable) tool to create the highest output quality.
        Recode creates the same quality, but it is still buggy.
        Last edited by michi90; 16 Jul 2005, 12:15 AM.

        Comment

        Working...