I could really really use some help here.
<o> </o>
Essentially, my project involves capturing old VHS tapes (home movies and the like) from S-VHS to a PYRO A/V Link (firewire DV capture) into DV AVI, doing some brief editing and restoring, and encoding them as DivX for posterity.<o></o>
<o> </o>
When I capture the feed it looks great playing in vegas, or even in windows media player, but when I open the video in virtualdub it looks terrible. The interlacing really shows through. Even after I apply interlace filters it looks bad.<o></o>
<o> </o>
Then when I export to DivX 6.1.1 pro codec it gives me a terrible looking result. I thought DivX was supposed to be a quality compression! The settings are all optimized.<o></o>
<o> </o>
multipass ~3 Mb/s, q-pel, excellent quality, adaptive multiple consecutive, keep aspect ratio, H.263 optimized... but it seems to be impossible.<o></o>
<o> </o>
Any idea why Virtualdub looks bad and produces such a poor quality when paired with DivX?<o></o>
<o> </o>
Additionally, I can throw the same file directly into Dr. Divx and get a much better looking final result, but I am assuming that the newest DivX codec (which I paid to use) should have the best output!<o></o>
<o> </o>
Any ideas??? Thank you!!!<o></o>
<o> </o>
Essentially, my project involves capturing old VHS tapes (home movies and the like) from S-VHS to a PYRO A/V Link (firewire DV capture) into DV AVI, doing some brief editing and restoring, and encoding them as DivX for posterity.<o></o>
<o> </o>
When I capture the feed it looks great playing in vegas, or even in windows media player, but when I open the video in virtualdub it looks terrible. The interlacing really shows through. Even after I apply interlace filters it looks bad.<o></o>
<o> </o>
Then when I export to DivX 6.1.1 pro codec it gives me a terrible looking result. I thought DivX was supposed to be a quality compression! The settings are all optimized.<o></o>
<o> </o>
multipass ~3 Mb/s, q-pel, excellent quality, adaptive multiple consecutive, keep aspect ratio, H.263 optimized... but it seems to be impossible.<o></o>
<o> </o>
Any idea why Virtualdub looks bad and produces such a poor quality when paired with DivX?<o></o>
<o> </o>
Additionally, I can throw the same file directly into Dr. Divx and get a much better looking final result, but I am assuming that the newest DivX codec (which I paid to use) should have the best output!<o></o>
<o> </o>
Any ideas??? Thank you!!!<o></o>
Comment