sorry for the comment, Dave, it was just that your picure looks all blurred and shaken
Post your pictures!
Collapse
X
-
Don't apologize. You're taking the fun out of this. I agree that the image has a natural blur to it. It was shot handheld - not on a tripod and it was just about dark.
Still, I like it.
If the only criteria for image review around here is focus then we're all cheating. Autofocus has rendered us all equal!Comment
-
pls don't get me wrong, Dave.
there are neither criteria here for posting nor was my intention to "criticise" your picture too much - when viewed in its original size as you posted it it lacked sharpness and because it did so in all areas the only cause can be a too long exposure time.
the atmoshere is great and i definitely envy you for this wonderful location just as i do envy paglamon for his trips to himalayaComment
-
hahahaha And now we do the political correctness dance, both trying to clarify. Don't worry my friend. I'm here just to have a little fun and talk photography. You need to know that I do have a fairly thick skin when it comes to critizism. And if I say anything that is offensive to anyone, it is not my intent.
So yes, long shutter + handheld = blur. It's hard to escape the physics of that one.
On the other hand, one of the images I posted earlier today, of Evgenia, one of those images had a 1.5 sec shutter and yes, I used a tripod!Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Some macros I shot a couple of days ago:
Canon EOS 30D
Canon EF 100mm MacroComment
-
Comment