Tweet
zx50,
Don't sweat it. IQ tests are designed and "administered" by those of less than brilliance, most usually. Interestingly, most of the architects of the IQ tests, though "learned" men were mostly of less than brilliance and are as the poem's "...blind men of Hindustan, whom though blind did endeavour to expound what an elephant is/'twas. One whom grasped the elephants tail, stated that the elephant was as a rope, another whom grasped the elephant's tusk said the elephant is as a spear, another whom grasped a leg, stated the elephant was as a tree, another whom grasped an ear, stated the elephant is as a fan, another whom grasped the elephants side, stated the elephant was as a wall, another whom grasped the elephant's trunk, stated the elephant was as a serpent, and it went on and on.
Though each of those noble males was respected, wealthy, learned and wise, and though each of them were partly right, each of them was damnedly wrong , because none of them had SIGHT.
I found it highly amusing that the architects of the tests have most usually had IQ's of less than 130 (stanford binet l-m) were "measuring the intelligence of some as high as even 217 (Marilyn Voss Savant - supposed most intelligent woman in the world (known)), whereas an IQ difference of 16 points can mean a life as a ditch digger or a doctor, lawyer, etc.. here those twerps were actually admitting her status (as compared to them) as a diety. I find Marilyn somewhat less than that and more likely a 180 or so.
I find that the architects of the IQ tests , though somewhat accurate up to about 140 or so, were exceedingly presumptuous after that mark.
Besides some of the IQ tests have feel good inflaters and also de-flaters. Some have cultural-bias, religionist, etc. questions and even some "give me" questions and even wrong/multiple answers. I have found that correct choices define the man as evolved and uncorrect choices as the "mark of the beast". the lowly man, the man whom is not honest, nor good. Education is only memorization and training, even apes can be taught sign-language and thereby the scientists did prove that apes do lie, also....SURPRISE!
The best advice a man can really adhere to, is to make correct choices.
Don't sweat it. IQ tests are designed and "administered" by those of less than brilliance, most usually. Interestingly, most of the architects of the IQ tests, though "learned" men were mostly of less than brilliance and are as the poem's "...blind men of Hindustan, whom though blind did endeavour to expound what an elephant is/'twas. One whom grasped the elephants tail, stated that the elephant was as a rope, another whom grasped the elephant's tusk said the elephant is as a spear, another whom grasped a leg, stated the elephant was as a tree, another whom grasped an ear, stated the elephant is as a fan, another whom grasped the elephants side, stated the elephant was as a wall, another whom grasped the elephant's trunk, stated the elephant was as a serpent, and it went on and on.
Though each of those noble males was respected, wealthy, learned and wise, and though each of them were partly right, each of them was damnedly wrong , because none of them had SIGHT.
I found it highly amusing that the architects of the tests have most usually had IQ's of less than 130 (stanford binet l-m) were "measuring the intelligence of some as high as even 217 (Marilyn Voss Savant - supposed most intelligent woman in the world (known)), whereas an IQ difference of 16 points can mean a life as a ditch digger or a doctor, lawyer, etc.. here those twerps were actually admitting her status (as compared to them) as a diety. I find Marilyn somewhat less than that and more likely a 180 or so.
I find that the architects of the IQ tests , though somewhat accurate up to about 140 or so, were exceedingly presumptuous after that mark.
Besides some of the IQ tests have feel good inflaters and also de-flaters. Some have cultural-bias, religionist, etc. questions and even some "give me" questions and even wrong/multiple answers. I have found that correct choices define the man as evolved and uncorrect choices as the "mark of the beast". the lowly man, the man whom is not honest, nor good. Education is only memorization and training, even apes can be taught sign-language and thereby the scientists did prove that apes do lie, also....SURPRISE!
The best advice a man can really adhere to, is to make correct choices.
Comment