Running people off

[Crash Override]

Going on 3 years here... FWIW, I grew up in Virginia, which I guess technically makes me a Southerner.

[Quality's Proof]

Well, crash,

You're about to be a "Damned Yankee" (a yankee that won't go home) as Resquirell is. If you're making that much more money in Al. than in Pa., then seems you were tired of scrubbing Pa. toilets., and decided to get a fed job (fed contractor jo : same thing). So, Yankee goes to South for more money, but is a fed job. Proves incompetence of fed, again.

I've builded some tech jobs for military, testing, etc., with a security clearance. Don't intend to go back to such.

I had a "severe" problem with a Pa., W. Va,. V.A. medical center(s), so it does not surprise me.

The shuttle "program" didn't return that Israeli safely, and also is not much of a success, that "Business" program.

[Crash Override]

Nope -- I actually don't work for any of the places I mentioned, but they *are* here. You pegged me, though. I was scrubbing toilets in PA and then they offered me six figures to come scrub toilets in Alabama. Pretty sweet deal. I do have a security clearance from when I did some work a couple of years ago for the CIA. But I'm not a federal employee, for good reason.

Thanks for your "reply". I look forward to getting "another" one. And by the way, it's 'built', not 'builded'. You should add a grammar elective to that human interaction class I suggested you take earlier.

I really am a know-it-all, though; I know PI to 20 digits, and the names of all the states in alphabetical order.

I thought you said you were going to stop posting, anyway? Promises, promises....

[Quality's Proof]

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Crash Override


[B]I do have a security clearance from when I did some work a couple of years ago for the CIA. But I'm not a federal employee, for good reason.

And by the way, it's 'built', not 'builded'.

I , and many others, turned down the CIA offers (mostly southerners in CIA, anyhow (Ta da))

In UK, it's still builded, as it is in the English of the old testament King James translations. And as it was in US in as late as the 19th and 20th century.

Pi to 20 places is only memorization, even "tested" retards can memorize that many places of pi. Anciently, pi represented the son, or the lamb of the old testament and of the new testament, did you know that?

Ever read the recount of how the male force of Nature tested Job (the religiously perfect) with that which was beyond the knowledge man can acquire ?

"Knowing", is for women, as the story of Eve, attests. Or do you not even understand the mythology of that book ?

Hhmmm, a man whom brags about skill at female things !

Crash, you're a wimp and a limp-wrist !

B T W : My posts are ending : haven't you noticed ?

[Crash Override]

Are you sure you're not from Alabama? Many bible-thumpers down here. Based on your e-mail etiquette and incessant name-calling, you're probably one of the least 'Christian' people I've met in a long time, which is ironic since you quote the Bible so much.

In any case, I didn't work for the CIA -- I did some work FOR them.... different situation.

As for the rest of your garbage, I won't even dignify it with a response. You've got some serious issues, dude. Can't believe no-one's booted you off this board yet. As for your posts ending, I'll believe it when I see it. I personally don't think you're capable of not commenting on something.

[Quality's Proof]

Originally posted by Crash Override


As for the rest of your garbage, I won't even dignify it with a response. You've got some serious issues, dude.

Can't believe no-one's booted you off this board yet.

Crash, you made claims of superiority : you could not back those claims ! Dude, I "got" you !

A human understands their culture's mythology, a robot beleives and worships. You don't even know whom God is, and you tout knowledge (memorized) of Pi to 20 decimal places. News flash, Pi does not know you.

[Crash Override]

You obviously have some sort of tremendous chip on your shoulder. There's a reason so many of your posts end in arguments -- you have no social skills to boot.

I don't remember making claims of superiority. In fact my comment about knowing PI to 20 decimal places was meant as humorous. See comment about social skills above.

I'm not particularly interested in mythology, but I'm not particularly interested in religion, either. I think the universe is an amazing enough place without having to make stuff up about it.

There's a difference between someone who understands technology, and someone who merely knows how to use it. It is, to say the least, arrogant and egotistical of you to call yourself a Digital Video Master because you know how to use a few (free) applications and know where to find things on the menus, speaking of 'memorized' knowledge. Why don't you just put 'Digital Video Wizard' on your avatar and complete your ridiculous image. If you can separate yourself from EverQuest long enough....

Or at the very least upgrade to XP Pro so that you can join a domain.

[Quality's Proof]

Dude , it's egoistical, not egotistical (ain't no such critter as you said).

Chip on the shoulder? I didn't do the flaming, and as a gang of pretentious "techies".

Memorizing? Not me. I look at what the question and the background is, as a man is not measured by memorization. But, spatial relations, is beyond you, but not beyond me and some others.

Seems you be a monkey, crash. Monkey see, monkey do?

Only a few threads were there arguments, and only with some whom weren't correct and wouldn't "let it go.". And so the sum total will be less.

But, you could be working for that dvd mastering factory in Alabama, for all we know.

Edit : As to the "master", dude, I passed the master's test when you were still sh.tting yellow. I wasn't referring to # of posts, hell, look at what they call setarip, with his myriad of posts.

And, I was working on computers in the early 1980's. You don't even understand the basics, do you? Do you remember Ohm's law, Millman's theorem, how about Thevinen's theorem (and Rth), remember how to scale the resonance of a nuclear plant, how about using a simple bridge as an ohmmeter for "touchy" circuits, do you remember polar notation of X,Y, and their corresponding co-ordinates, figured out how to build (from spec.) a computer that doesn't need a cooling fan, built your own un-interrupted poiwer supply, did you pass the calculus courses or elect the b.llsh.t "statistics", which the wimps chose, did you astound your college physics professor with your mind being faster with the answers on the gravity acceleration X, Y, co-ordinates (vector analysis) equations than the other students sliderules/calculators (do you know what a slide rule is and why we prefer it), do you know what vector analysis is, do you even know what scientific notation is, have you understood quantam mechanics, found the flaw, and therefore "got" Hawkins", did you "get" an entire asian lodge of mensans on a very basic thing? You're even less than a pup.

When a"real" poster posts a problem, they do not argue at me, it is some posters whom do not solve real posters' problems whom are ? Jealous ? Undoubtedly, the "techie" "possee suffers from "pen.s eny", also.

[Crash Override]

Hmm. Struck a nerve there, eh?

You, um, have no idea how old I am. I was working on computers in the early 1980's, too. Difference of course being that I'm *still* working with them and have progressed as they have.

Surely, saying that V=IR would make me as wise as you, so there you are. And I too could quote the many physics, electrical engineering, programming, calculus and discrete mathematics courses I took in college, but really, I don't see the point. What matters is what you do with the knowledge, not just that you have it.

Thing is, you'd think since you reworked quantum mechanics you'd at least have learned how to spell it in the process.

You really should look into that XP Pro upgrade, though.

[BoF]

Originally posted by Quality's Proof
I was working on computers in the early 1980's. You don't even understand the basics, do you?

Originally posted by Crash Override
I was working on computers in the early 1980's, too. Difference of course being that I'm *still* working with them and have progressed as they have.

I'm pretty sure people working on computers in the early 1980's are now wise enough to keep this thread respectful

[EMW]

Quality's Proof, and Crash Override,

What do you guys do for a living, with knowledge as extent as that??

[Crash Override]

EMW - I'm a senior developer consultant for a software consulting company. As for what I actually do and who I work for.... it varies from month to month. Anything from developing civil engineering application modules in C++ which implement pond routing, to debugging Unix C code that tracks aircraft entering airspace, to developing natural language extraction applications for the CIA. I also author DVDs on the side, and for awhile I had a company that did 3D animation for various companies.

[Quality's Proof]

EMW,

As far as employment goes, as of now, I don't have any, nor do I want any. I've been rated as permanently and severely physically disabled for a long while: ~ 3 decades. Still, though, I worked ~ 30 years. Mostly, worked as a journeyman wireman/master electrician (passed the master's test many years ago). As my education was in computer mechanics/electronics, I usually wound up as a de facto trouble shooter at power plants (where electricity is produced), computer installations (frames), auto factories, assembly line robotics testing, etc.. I've also worked as a logger (softwood/hardwood), truckdriver, small engine mechanic, when jobs have been scarce (or of a lower wage), was doing such whilst a teenager and already had that skill. I've also done electrical / electronics design work for third party systems developers , but, usually there was not enough lead time for me to do that, with regular work schedule/locations. And I've done some pro bono legal work for others.

Nowadays, I sometimes wonder why I tried , until, I remember, that the trying, was for to prove a point, at the end, though, sometimes, I forget, what that point was/is.

[Quality's Proof]

Originally posted by Crash Override
Hmm. Struck a nerve there, eh?

You, um, have no idea how old I am. I was working on computers in the early 1980's, too. Difference of course being that I'm *still* working with them and have progressed as they have.

Surely, saying that V=IR would make me as wise as you, so there you are. And I too could quote the many physics, electrical engineering, programming, calculus and discrete mathematics courses I took in college, but really, I don't see the point. What matters is what you do with the knowledge, not just that you have it.

Thing is, you'd think since you reworked quantum mechanics you'd at least have learned how to spell it i

Hhmmm.......it would also seem you have no idea of my age, also. But, more to the point, computers haven't really progressed, it's still electricity, hardware, software = computer.

Hhmmm ! Actually, it is E = IR , as V is a discernable measurement. Programmers do not have the computer mechanics/electronics knowledge, which you would lead others to believe, nor do they most usually take calculus, as programming courses do not require such calculus. Or, did you not understand that I had the Boolean Algebra course, also?

Different ways to spell quantam, as an ancient root, etc., but your use of a "word" which doesn't exist (egotistical), belies the fact you are a "he said/she said" type person. There is both quantitative and qualitative analysis, and there is also an electrical/electronics analysis called : nodal analysis (amongst the various types of analysis, which also includes "common sense", etc.). Your admission of employment at dvd mastering, proves you are on the boards to post confusion, lest the viewers are so gullible as to believe you serve two (2) masters. I haven't seen any of your real solutions posted to any real posters.

Hawkins was/is wrong about some basic things, and therefore his conclusions are flawed, as : Sh.t in = Sh.t out.

[Quality's Proof]

Originally posted by BoF
I'm pretty sure people working on computers in the early 1980's are now wise enough to keep this thread respectful

Hhmmm....... And, Justly what would be respectful about any thread being started to flame someone, since flaming is "dissin". ?