What is your most hated film of 2004/2005/2006/2007/2008/2009/2010/2011/2012/2013?

[Chewy]

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/night_at_the_museum/

kind of sums it up, what hollywood is doing to fill those seats

[LT. Columbo]

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/night_at_the_museum/
kind of sums it up, what hollywood is doing to fill those seats

those reviews tell me i'll like it.

[photo_angel2004]

Ok against better judgement I actually watched Snakes on a plane.

I guess it wasnt too bad the story line was ok but the snakes were so fake it was actually funny.

There were a few shots where the snakes looked real but for the most part it was like watching a bunch of rubber snakes moving around.

With all the technology that there is on animation that could have been done better as least I think so.

[nwg]

With all the technology that there is on animation that could have been done better as least I think so.

It's down to budget. SOAP is no more than a B film with a B film budget. It just got popular from Internet hype (Blair Witch Project).

[volfann]

I'm sure Mr. Jackson was well compensated for his role in S.O.A.P. His back had to be hurting from carrying all the dead weight. Very few actors could have pulled it off the way he did and turn a B grade piece of crap into a fairly enjoyable film. Cheers to you Mr. Jackson!!

[nwg]

I'm sure Mr. Jackson was well compensated for his role in S.O.A.P. His back had to be hurting from carrying all the dead weight. Very few actors could have pulled it off the way he did and turn a B grade piece of crap into a fairly enjoyable film. Cheers to you Mr. Jackson!!

It could have ended up like Snakes on a Train. A straight to DVD cash in with no name actors and is one of the worse films ever made.

[photo_angel2004]

It's down to budget. SOAP is no more than a B film with a B film budget. It just got popular from Internet hype (Blair Witch Project).

I liked that one, was different and original. I thought that the lack of technology on that one made it look more real ... like someone really did that with their own video camera and thats what happened.

Even though it wasnt at all true.

That has to be the lowest budget movie with the largest profit margin ever. LOL


No name actors no money spent on the making and look how many people went to see it and bought the VHS (back then LMFAO)

[Dan]

Blair Witch still has the honors Based on Return on Investment...

Budget $35,000
Worldwide Gross $248,300,000
Percentage Return 354,614.29%

On the other end are beauty's like Town & Country, Stealth and Pluto Nash.

[volfann]

Don't forget about those two over bloated turkeys "Heavens Gate" and "Ishtar"

[BR7]

I just got done watching "The Illusionist" I have to say I really liked it.It was a bit predictable but IMHO it didn't hurt the movie one bit it was beautifully written and directed.Edward Norton,Jessica Biel and Paul Giamatti were fantastic. I was most impressed with Giamatti he proved to me that there is no need to type cast him as the silly man all the time he showed he can play the serious character.

[NightTran]

I definitely have Feb.13 marked on my calender I can't wait to see "The Departed".I almost bought "The Illusionist" today but I got The Wire Season 1(HBO Series),The Descent,The Wicker Man and Crank instead.I am going to get it next week though along with "Invincible". As for The Guardian,Fly Boys and Flags Of Our Fathers this is first I have heard of them and I will check them out.I do agree with you on "The Good Shepherd" I expect it to be very good

@nwg
Yes it was the R1 unrated version

Just watch Departed yesterday and it is good, may wait a few more day for the Good Shepherd

[BR7]

Thanks for the encouragement Night Far as I am concerned you can never go wrong with a Scorsese flick

[volfann]

@BR7- Giamatti is one of the better supporting actors around today. If you haven't seen it yet you should see him in "Cinderella Man". This guy has really studued his craft well.. Check out his Bio! Even his considerable acting skills couldn't save "Lady In The Water" though. That was one film I expected more from and was totally let down when I finally got to see it.. Waste of good talent.

On a sillier note: "Mexican Werewolf In Texas" was one of the silliest pieces of crap I have ever suffered through lately. I wasn't expecting too much from it but it couldn't even scare my kids. Stay away from this turkey.. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0756689/

[BR7]

I have not seen "Cinderella Man" yet but I will give it a look.Thanks for the warning on "Lady In The Water" I almost bought it twice now but I kept seeing other movies I wanted more.I also watched the "The Da Vinci Code" & "Superman II The Richard Donner Collection" and loved both of them.I am very suprised by the low rating on imdb I thought The Da Vinci Code was better then 6.5 it's getting I found the movie very interesting and well told.As for Superman II RDC it's a shame they didn't let him do it his way in the first place we could have seen a better series IMO

[LT. Columbo]

i thought da vinci was pretty good too, cinderella man is a must see. i was reluctant because of the title, but a fine film.