All of the Sony 16x Accu, +R that I have seen are (as you stated) MIT but the -R are MIJ. At least the ones I have and have seen.
Nero CD-DVD Speed, a great tool
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally Posted by dmanshead@ geno888
sony accucores with a sony ID are usually MITComment
-
Originally Posted by NightTranThanks I will look if it is onsale ( I thought These burns were from you )
I read the thread on pioneer 111 on CDF, and I found that it's a very good burner for DL discs.
The bad thing is that I need also a new HDD, and I can't afford both the pio111 and the HDDComment
-
Well i flashed my memorex dvd+/- rw true 8xI with SOHW-812S firmware which is what the drive really is. it now shows up as a liteon. I'm about ready to do the first burn with it to see how it all turns out.If you use these forums you will not have to face that...
Long Live Foamy!!!
My burners Nec ND 3550A, Benq DQ60, Liteon SHW P6S, 2 Sony AW_Q170A's (free with my new system) and JLMS XJ-HD S.Comment
-
Originally Posted by copylessAll of the Sony 16x Accu, +R that I have seen are (as you stated) MIT but the -R are MIJ. At least the ones I have and have seen.If you use these forums you will not have to face that...
Long Live Foamy!!!
My burners Nec ND 3550A, Benq DQ60, Liteon SHW P6S, 2 Sony AW_Q170A's (free with my new system) and JLMS XJ-HD S.Comment
-
here's the results the first was a movie and second was data by cd-dvd speedIf you use these forums you will not have to face that...
Long Live Foamy!!!
My burners Nec ND 3550A, Benq DQ60, Liteon SHW P6S, 2 Sony AW_Q170A's (free with my new system) and JLMS XJ-HD S.Comment
-
Here are the scans of those same discs but with my other liteon, i think it scans better.
the memorex aka liteon has seen it's better days. here's to new burners and all the fun they will entail!!!!If you use these forums you will not have to face that...
Long Live Foamy!!!
My burners Nec ND 3550A, Benq DQ60, Liteon SHW P6S, 2 Sony AW_Q170A's (free with my new system) and JLMS XJ-HD S.Comment
-
Ok did some test trying to burn at 16x the second burn did better than the first. First time for this particular media. defragged(as best it would) the volume before attempting, turned off all programs except my virus/firewall running in my sys tray. I'm wondering if this PIII 733mhz 512 ram is maybe a bit physically challenged trying to write this fast???....
read over @cdfreaks about a test program of online hyper tuning for this type of burner, hmmmmmm....... Maybe i have Just a tad too much time on my hands but at least this hobby keeps me out of trouble.Attached Files- LITE-ON_DVDRW_SHW-160P6S_PS0A_16x test.png (54.9 KB, 204 views)
- LITE-ON_DVDRW_SHW-160P6S_PS0A_16x test 2.png (57.5 KB, 208 views)
- LITE-ON_DVDRW_SHW-160P6S_PS0A_16x test scan.png (54.8 KB, 199 views)
- LITE-ON_DVDRW_SHW-160P6S_PS0A_16x test 2 scan.png (54.8 KB, 197 views)
- LITE-ON_DVDRW_SHW-160P6S_PS0A_prodisc info.png (31.4 KB, 213 views)
If you use these forums you will not have to face that...
Long Live Foamy!!!
My burners Nec ND 3550A, Benq DQ60, Liteon SHW P6S, 2 Sony AW_Q170A's (free with my new system) and JLMS XJ-HD S.Comment
-
geno,
I would like to ask you a big favor when you get time
please post some sets of quality scans of identical disks (liteon & benq)
would be very interested to see some done where pif totals were in hundreds and low thousands
just 2 sets would be fine
say a grade B burn and a C burn
litey scans at 8x 1 ecc benq 8x 8eccComment
-
i tried burning my sonys at 8x today,then i scaned,and i think that scan looked better than the 6x or 4x scans...so i made a test...
heres the first scanComment
-
here are test results,burned iso in dvdspeedComment
-
Ok Chewy
Here there is the first test.
Verbatim +R 16x MCC004 made in india burned @12x with a pioneer 108.
First pic is burn, second is scan with benq 1640, third is scan with liteon 1693 done at 8x, and fourth is TRT.
Next scans are coming. I need some more time to completeComment
Comment