My new Verbatims

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • uufta
    Digital Video Expert
    Digital Video Expert
    • Dec 2005
    • 635

    My new Verbatims

    My latest purchase of Verbatim's 16x mcc-004

    I dont think this means "good" does it?
    Attached Files
    Last edited by uufta; 3 Nov 2006, 01:00 AM.
  • Chewy
    Super Moderator
    • Nov 2003
    • 18971

    #2
    do a test disk with cdspeed, probably the last part will look bad when it gets up above 14x

    Comment

    • uufta
      Digital Video Expert
      Digital Video Expert
      • Dec 2005
      • 635

      #3
      This what you are looking for?
      Attached Files

      Comment

      • Chewy
        Super Moderator
        • Nov 2003
        • 18971

        #4
        where's the quality scan?

        Comment

        • uufta
          Digital Video Expert
          Digital Video Expert
          • Dec 2005
          • 635

          #5
          OOPS
          Attached Files

          Comment

          • NightTran
            King of Digital Video
            King of Digital Video
            • Aug 2005
            • 4224

            #6
            if you burn at 8x is the quality better? plus take the WOPC off
            sigpic

            Comment

            • Chewy
              Super Moderator
              • Nov 2003
              • 18971

              #7
              Let's hope an 8x burn is better, looks like the verb's aren't the best either, but the drive is probably showing it's age

              Comment

              • NightTran
                King of Digital Video
                King of Digital Video
                • Aug 2005
                • 4224

                #8
                I dont know if the burners are old, 8-9 month are not that bad unless you burn 2000 + already
                sigpic

                Comment

                • uufta
                  Digital Video Expert
                  Digital Video Expert
                  • Dec 2005
                  • 635

                  #9
                  Originally Posted by NightTran
                  if you burn at 8x is the quality better? plus take the WOPC off
                  Why take that off?

                  However, if you are confident that your DVD media are of superb condition, you can disable this function to reduce burning time. Or you might need to disable WOPC on poor-quality DVD-R media under low-speed (<4x) burning to increase chances of successful burning

                  About 200+/- a few,

                  Also I am new at this remember, should I do another data disk like the last, except 8x
                  or do you want me to change anything before I do?? (besides WOPC)
                  Last edited by uufta; 3 Nov 2006, 05:25 AM.

                  Comment

                  • Chewy
                    Super Moderator
                    • Nov 2003
                    • 18971

                    #10
                    one test might be to disconnect extra items from the power supply, faster burns take more laser power(or that's the way I figure it)

                    Comment

                    • NightTran
                      King of Digital Video
                      King of Digital Video
                      • Aug 2005
                      • 4224

                      #11
                      it smoother burn if you take that off, I keep every on with not very good media, you can try burn at 16x with WOPC off I bet your quality will be better then the one you post
                      sigpic

                      Comment

                      • uufta
                        Digital Video Expert
                        Digital Video Expert
                        • Dec 2005
                        • 635

                        #12
                        Thanks Night I was trying to be "confident that your DVD media are of superb condition"
                        before I shut that WOPC off.

                        Here is an 8x data disc burn......as requested
                        Attached Files
                        Last edited by uufta; 3 Nov 2006, 06:19 AM.

                        Comment

                        • NightTran
                          King of Digital Video
                          King of Digital Video
                          • Aug 2005
                          • 4224

                          #13
                          BSLB still the best firmware
                          sigpic

                          Comment

                          • uufta
                            Digital Video Expert
                            Digital Video Expert
                            • Dec 2005
                            • 635

                            #14
                            How does that scan look?
                            I will flash back to BSLB today, was just trying BSRB out for awhile, BSLB is so old though, none of the newer ones are better?

                            Can anyone tell if the Verbs are bad?

                            Comment

                            • jamoskeag3
                              Digital Video Master
                              Digital Video Master
                              • Nov 2005
                              • 1327

                              #15
                              Is there a guide or something that explains how to read these scan results?

                              Comment

                              Working...