you're reading my mind pretty well
Hi Guys. What Burners Do You Recommend?
Collapse
X
-
I saw the same board refurb, for $48 and when I went back to buy the board and it was gone, so it was you Chewy that bought the broad from under me.Star Baby Girl, Born March,1997 Died June 30th 2007 6:35 PM.Comment
-
hi chewy. i'll get 2 everest soon. what kind of hardware issue would i have pertaining to the 2 pioneers i sent back? the 115d, and the 112d? just got some flack at cdfreaks about how it has 2 b a hardware problem. my other burners had no problem. same system. same software. also remember the sata 20x lite-on that wouldn't burn at 8x w/sony dvd-r 16x media, that had an issue not related to my hardware, or software, but w/the burn speed and certain brand blanks.
then again the guy who gave me flack is supposedly a tech from pioneer who's supposedly trying to help. go figure. no coincidence huh. i'm not going 2 go bonkers over a burner that doesn't function, when i have 2 good name brand ones that are perfectly fine. especially the samsung which is 1 of the big guns now.
bottom line this i...t pmtfo.SAMSUNG SH-S203B, SAMSUNG SH-S223F,
Take the suggestions and follow the directions. The results will speak for themselves.
Google is definitely our friend.Comment
-
your computer may have issues, it's hard to draw conclusions from one drive to another since this all is such a can of worms anymore
for example
I burned 2 dvd's on an older nec 3520, one of the burns took 13 1/2 minutes at 8X, I scanned both burns and then did a burn in my LG and scanned it.
All three disks showed the same general bad area, the old nec when it hit the worst of the two disks had a lot of high errors(PIF), the better of the 2 disks had smaller pif's but in the same pattern and places
my lg burning the third disk(next off the spindle) had almost all it's errors in the same pattern but only a fraction of the intensityComment
-
you mean the whole thing w/burners nowadays huh? well what would i have to check 4 as far as my pc? or just go w/if what i have is not broken then don't fix it? if there's something i could look 4 i'll do it. if it's not anything 2 big of a deal that you see being that my lg and samsung r fine then i'll just leave it at that. could this b a compatability issue w/my samsung? the pioneer did burn dvds well w/no problem. just issues w/the cds w/reading, and writing.SAMSUNG SH-S203B, SAMSUNG SH-S223F,
Take the suggestions and follow the directions. The results will speak for themselves.
Google is definitely our friend.Comment
-
ok. chewy. lets do this.
Field Value
CPU Properties
CPU Type Intel Pentium 4 521
CPU Alias Prescott
CPU Stepping G1
Engineering Sample No
CPUID CPU Name Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz
CPUID Revision 00000F49h
CPU Speed
CPU Clock 2792.91 MHz (original: 2800 MHz)
CPU Multiplier 14.0x
CPU FSB 199.49 MHz (original: 200 MHz)
Memory Bus 265.99 MHz
CPU Cache
L1 Trace Cache 12K Instructions
L1 Data Cache 16 KB
L2 Cache 1 MB (On-Die, ECC, ATC, Full-Speed)
Motherboard Properties
Motherboard ID <DMI>
Motherboard Name Dell Dell DV051
Chipset Properties
Motherboard Chipset Intel Grantsdale-G i915GV
Memory Timings 4-4-4-11 (CL-RCD-RP-RAS)
SPD Memory Modules
DIMM1: Samsung M3 78T3354CZ3-CD5 256 MB DDR2-533 DDR2 SDRAM (5.0-4-4-11 @ 266 MHz) (4.0-4-4-11 @ 266 MHz) (3.0-3-3-8 @ 200 MHz)
DIMM3: Samsung M3 78T3354CZ3-CD5 256 MB DDR2-533 DDR2 SDRAM (5.0-4-4-11 @ 266 MHz) (4.0-4-4-11 @ 266 MHz) (3.0-3-3-8 @ 200 MHz)
BIOS Properties
System BIOS Date 04/04/06
Video BIOS Date 07/18/20
DMI BIOS Version A04
Graphics Processor Properties
Video Adapter Intel 82910GL/915G/915GL/915GV Graphics Controller 0
GPU Code Name Grantsdale-G (Integrated 8086 / 2582, Rev 04)
GPU Clock 333 MHzSAMSUNG SH-S203B, SAMSUNG SH-S223F,
Take the suggestions and follow the directions. The results will speak for themselves.
Google is definitely our friend.Comment
-
this is what i got after i hit the refreshh on memory latency.
CPU CPU Clock Motherboard Chipset Memory CL-RCD-RP-RAS Latency
Athlon64 3500+ 2200 MHz MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum nForce3-Ultra Dual PC3200 DDR 2-2-2-5 45.6 ns
Athlon64 3400+ 2200 MHz Chaintech VNF3-250 nForce3-250 PC3200 DDR SDRAM 2-2-2-5 48.4 ns
Athlon64 3500+ 2200 MHz Asus A8V K8T800Pro Dual PC3200 DDR 2.5-3-3-7 58.8 ns
Athlon64 X2 4800+ 2400 MHz Asus A8N-SLI Deluxe nForce4-SLI Dual PC3200 DDR 2.5-3-3-8 62.2 ns
Athlon64 3800+ 2400 MHz Gigabyte GA-K8NSNXP-939 nForce3-Ultra Dual PC2700 DDR 2-3-3-7 67.8 ns
Opteron 246 2000 MHz Iwill DK8N nForce3Pro-250 Dual PC3200R DDR 2.5-3-3-8 68.0 ns
P4EE 3733 MHz MSI P4N Diamond nForce4-SLI-Intel Dual DDR2-667 4-4-4-15 76.3 ns
P4 3000 MHz Epox EP-4PCA3+ i875P + PAT Dual PC3200 DDR 2.5-3-3-8 78.9 ns
P4 2600 MHz Asus P4P800 i865PE + PAT Dual PC3200 DDR 2.5-3-3-6 79.7 ns
Opteron 248 2200 MHz MSI K8T Master1-FAR K8T800 Dual PC2100R DDR 2-3-3-6 83.1 ns
P4 540 3200 MHz Abit AA8-DuraMAX i925X Dual DDR2-533 3-3-3-8 84.5 ns
Pentium EE 840 3200 MHz Intel D955XBK i955X Dual DDR2-667 4-4-4-11 85.6 ns
P4 540 3200 MHz Epox EP-5EGA+ i915G Ext. Dual PC3200 DDR 2-2-2-5 86.7 ns
Xeon 2800 MHz Asus PC-DL i875P + PAT Dual PC2700 DDR 2-3-3-5 94.9 ns
Pentium M 1500 MHz Acer TravelMate 4500 i855GME Ext. PC2700 DDR SDRAM 2.5-3-3-7 101.0 ns
P4 3000 MHz Intel D865PERL i865PE Dual PC3200 DDR 3-3-3-8 101.4 ns
Pentium M 730J 1600 MHz Acer TravelMate 4150 i915PM Dual DDR2-400 3-3-3-8 101.9 ns
AthlonXP 3100+ 2200 MHz ASRock K7S8XE SiS748 PC3200 DDR SDRAM 2.5-3-3-5 102.2 ns
P4 521 2800 MHz Dell Dell DV051 i915GV Int. Dual DDR2-533 4-4-4-11 102.9 ns
AthlonXP 2500+ 1833 MHz Asus A7N8X-E nForce2-U400 PC2700 DDR SDRAM 2.5-3-3-7 105.4 ns
P4 3066 MHz MSI 848P Neo-S i848P PC2700 DDR SDRAM 2.5-3-3-7 115.1 ns
P4 2600 MHz Asus P4P800 i865PE Dual PC3200 DDR 2.5-4-4-7 117.8 ns
P4 2400 MHz Asus P4T533 i850E Dual PC1066 RDRAM - 121.8 ns
P4 3200 MHz Gigabyte GA-8TRS350MT RS350 Int. Dual PC3200 DDR 3-3-3-8 125.2 ns
Sempron 2600+ 1833 MHz ASRock K7VT4A+ KT400A PC2700 DDR SDRAM 2.5-3-3-7 131.5 ns
P4 2533 MHz DFI NT72-SC i850E Dual PC800 RDRAM - 150.8 ns
C3 1333 MHz VIA EPIA SP CN400 Int. PC3200 DDR SDRAM 2.5-3-3-8 161.3 ns
PIII-E 600 MHz Acorp 6V8633A ApolloPro266 PC2100 DDR SDRAM 2.5-3-3-6 166.8 ns
Celeron 2400 MHz Gigabyte GA-8TRS350MT RS350 Int. Dual PC3200 DDR 3-3-3-8 169.2 ns
C3 800 MHz VIA EPIA PLE133 PC133 SDRAM 3-3-3-6 178.5 ns
Duron 1300 MHz Asus A7V KT133 PC133 SDRAM 3-3-3-6 182.6 ns
AthlonXP 1800+ 1533 MHz Gigabyte GA-7DXE AMD760 PC2100 DDR SDRAM 2.5-3-3-7 191.3 ns
Celeron 2000 MHz Abit TH7II i850 Dual PC600 RDRAM - 191.8 ns
PIII 450 MHz Intel VC820 i820 PC600 RDRAM - 209.0 ns
PIII Xeon 550 MHz IBM Netfinity 8500R Profusion PC100R SDRAM - 221.0 ns
K6-III 400 MHz Epox EP-MVP3G-M MVP3 PC100 SDRAM 2-2-2-5 248.5 ns
PII 266 MHz Intel DK440LX i440LX PC66 SDRAM 3-2-2-6 272.9 ns
K6-2 500 MHz PCChips M577 MVP3 PC100 SDRAM 2-3-3-6 286.8 nsLast edited by Chewy; 10 Jan 2008, 03:13 PM.SAMSUNG SH-S203B, SAMSUNG SH-S223F,
Take the suggestions and follow the directions. The results will speak for themselves.
Google is definitely our friend.Comment
-
Athlon64 3500+ 2200 MHz MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum nForce3-Ultra Dual PC3200 DDR 2-2-2-5 45.6 ns
Athlon64 2250 MHz Asus A8V Deluxe K8T800Pro Dual PC4000 DDR 2.5-4-4-10 46.2 ns
Athlon64 3400+ 2200 MHz Chaintech VNF3-250 nForce3-250 PC3200 DDR SDRAM 2-2-2-5 48.4 nsComment
-
what do i do w/this? can i put it 2 50ns/ if so how/ if not what does it mean/ some defect, or failure?SAMSUNG SH-S203B, SAMSUNG SH-S223F,
Take the suggestions and follow the directions. The results will speak for themselves.
Google is definitely our friend.Comment
-
damn I wish I could try 2 of these in that computer
Comment
-
I was just getting an idea of what your computer was like?
even going lower mid level would be a drastic upgrade in performance
right now your memory was holding you way back for any cpu intensive work
any dual core you go to will give you almost double the cpu and with even 1-2 gigs of fast ram that should really speed thinngs upComment
-
damn I wish I could try 2 of these in that computer
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820146568SAMSUNG SH-S203B, SAMSUNG SH-S223F,
Take the suggestions and follow the directions. The results will speak for themselves.
Google is definitely our friend.Comment
Comment