RB 1.03 Pro vs DVD2ONE v2 vs ...

[jeo]

since both versions can be found as stickies in this rebuilder forum, i guess you have seen my guide as well

oh yes i saw all here and in domm9,they have quality/details but big size too.
i was asking if have any short.......seems that don't have...ok.

thank you!

[UncasMS]

another encoder

a new encoder test - judge for yourself:

where do you spot differences to procoder?
and have a guess which encoder we're dealing with here!
(encoding time 179 min)


1.


2.


3.


4.


5.




no filters were used by the way

[jeo]

if you are comparing here with rb pictures from the first page,
the #4 here is the (really)worse of all.
here this picture is washed and with too bad solarizations.

[UncasMS]

i have some more comments and differences i see but i want to wait some more and hopefully read some more replies/guesses/impressions

[nwg]

if you are comparing here with rb pictures from the first page,
the #4 here is the (really)worse of all.
here this picture is washed and with too bad solarizations.

I agree with that. The #4 pic above is too yellow.

The other pictures look practically identical with very minimal differences.

Whatever the encoder is, It still beats the DVD2One pics. I can't get over the amount of blocking in the first pic.

I think it looks like the Quenc Encoder (probably is CCE though).

[UncasMS]

I think it looks like the Quenc Encoder (probably is CCE though).

good guess but this is what quenc looks like:
(high quality mode, 2 pass vbr, trellis quantization - encoding time: 225 min)



1.


2.


3.


4.


5.

[jeo]

new encoder test - judge for yourself:

where do you spot differences to procoder?
and have a guess which encoder we're dealing with here!

i forgot to post about encoder in the first answer:...this is not from CCE,it's too rought and blocky.
maybe rejig(?)

[UncasMS]

the rejig results were posted already; they look worse than all the others and you've already replied there:

http://forum.digital-digest.com/showpost.php?p=316333&postcount=25

^_~

[nwg]

If it isn't Quenc. Then CCE and Procoder is left.

[UncasMS]

no, procoder results were given already and it is not cce

any more guesses?



+++++

one more clue added:

the encoding time was 179 min

[jeo]

oh my...have hard rain here and the energy was gone when i was posting.

the rejig results were posted already

if is not from rejig,cce,procoder,HC....only have the Quenc option.
or you tested something new?(and bad,the last pictures(1 and 2) are horribles too)

[nwg]

Is it FreeEnc?

[jeo]

freenc (frank as i call) is too bad, no news version a long time and aqe(developing in the same(bad)forum) is horrible too.this encoders came from one forum that have more "chat"(bla bla blas) that real work.

[nwg]

If it isn't CCE then I have no idea. I am not aware of any other encoders that can be used by DVD-RB.

You haven't managed to get TMPGEnc to work have you?

[UncasMS]

or you tested something new?

not really, but this release is new and has improved very much in the speed department

i have used sapstar's AUTOQMATENC 32b

(i havent used hc in this comparison btw ^_~ - maybe i should add cce and hc as well)