DGDecode speed

[blutach]

@UncasMS

I have heard this version of DGDecode is faster than 1.1 Do you have any knowledge of this and what it may do for encoding times? (encoding a 3 hour movie as I type and I think it will take 8 hours).

Regards

[UncasMS]

i havent compared any speed yet but might do a cce opv test later on and compare the result with this: http://forum.digital-digest.com/show...highlight=idct

[blutach]

94% done now - then need to rebuild.

Regards

[UncasMS]

ok, a testrun has finished

this was the speed with the old version 1.1

32 bit ssemmx idct (skal) 64 min

and this is the result using 1.45

Phase II ENCODING completed in 60 minutes.

in addition to the ~4 min i must add that the machine was running with a 5% slower core frequency than before

so there is a noticable speed difference as this test was done with cce opv mode and skal idct and i normally dont use cce or opv mode

[blutach]

Yes, my felling is this is a good 15% faster. Was very impressed.

Regards

[UncasMS]

btw: the skal idct i used is not one of those idct's which have changed with the latest rb release and therefor have severe influence on speed

[Demvang]

Using the new DGDecode.dll, speed is from 1.86 to 2.10 with CCE for me

[blutach]

Thanks for that Demvang - I might start to use it.

Regards

[UncasMS]

didnt you do so already?

[blutach]

No. I tend to use what jdobbs puts in the package (other than RBOpt).

Regards

[UncasMS]

and what new dg are we talking about?

i had 1.45 in mind and that was part of recent rb pro versions

[jeo]

hi all!
i'm testing the new DGMPGDec 1.4.6 Final in RB 0.96 and ...
edit....MISMATCH,don't work
sorry!

regards!

[UncasMS]

can't trust"!

neither will we

[jeo]

i need to do a new prepare step because the version not match.
.....later!

EDIT.DON'T WORK!!!
dgindex/dgdecode mismatch doing a new prepare stage and loading any .avs in vdubmod!

[jeo]

errrr.......

sorry for my desinformation guys! (i'm editing old posts)



now let me ask:
what version you are using?

regards