Everybody Vote : Permanent or Non-Permanent Subtitles ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • iparout
    Junior Member
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2002
    • 38

    Everybody Vote : Permanent or Non-Permanent Subtitles ?

    The title says it all...

    Those of you who *DO* create subtitles for your movies, do you prefer to encode them Permanently on the picture or do you create Non-Permanent\Removable subtitles ?

    Your vote will be appreciated.
    8
    Permanent Subtitles
    0%
    3
    Non Permanent \ Removable Subtitles
    0%
    5
  • khp
    The Other
    • Nov 2001
    • 2161

    #2
    I prefer removable subtitles.

    The reason is simple, quality.

    Permanent subtitles will decrease the compressability by 2-3% (If I recall correctly, it might be a bit more). And unless you are at maximum quality you will get visible blurring around the subtitles.

    Permanent subs should only be used if you can't use external subtitles.
    Last edited by khp; 11 Dec 2002, 11:20 AM.
    Donate your idle CPU time for something usefull.
    http://folding.stanford.edu/

    Comment

    • iparout
      Junior Member
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2002
      • 38

      #3
      I will most probably be doing removable subs from now on, however what bugs me most is that removable subtitles will most probably not be compatible with future standalone DivX players and furthermore I will need to carry with me the DirectVobSub installation file in case I want to see my movies on a friend's computer or any other computer without DirectVobSub.

      P.S. : EVERYONE, don't forget to vote for the poll !!!

      Comment

      • ivwshane
        Member
        Member
        • Feb 2002
        • 56

        #4
        The only time I use subtitles is when the movie is not in english and since I only know english if I want to understand what going on then I will always need them. Therefore permanent subtitles for me.

        And the fact that not every player can display non-permanent subs is another factor for me.

        Comment

        • Enchanter
          Old member
          • Feb 2002
          • 5417

          #5
          I would have voted for separate subtitles if only I was not dealing with multiple AVI files (each requiring a subtitle script of their own) on 1 disc. It would have been too much trouble to have that many files on one disc and worse, to instruct anyone borrowing my discs on how to enable the subtitles (I can already see their brow creasing). Otherwise, separate subtitles are always good.

          Comment

          • Fluffy
            Junior Member
            Junior Member
            • Nov 2001
            • 44

            #6
            I encode with permanent subtitles because its what i know how to do, and I'm to lazy to figure out how to do it non permanent. Not to mention permanent subtitles means one less file to get currupted or lost or whatever. I can see the appeal of using non permanent subtitles, especialy if you want to use the video for something else such as a music video or whatever.
            Helicopters do not fly. They beat the sky into submission.
            -Aaden Satpulov

            Comment

            • sneglen
              Platinum Member
              Platinum Member
              • Oct 2002
              • 153

              #7
              I would say both, because if you make DivX, I like to have them Removable because I make Menu's and extra features with the MicroDVD player.

              But for SVCD's there aren't many Standalone DVD players that can use removeable subtitles so there I would use permenant, so it depends.

              If Nobody Bought Movies, Why Should They Continue To Make Them?

              "Bull****" Neo To The Father Of The Matrix In Reloaded

              Comment

              Working...