Guys;
obviously it is handy to do:
MiniDV -> mpeg2 -> editing, etc -> mpeg4
i compared the above sequence with a straight:
MiniDV -> mpeg4
and I "think" the quality was better...(?)
Is it my imagination or the double conversion of the first scheme does indeed reduce some quality ???
cheers
yannis
BTW; I have some video on DivX (I don't have the original ) and I want to do some editing on premiere; any ideas of what to do with the signal after I edit it??? If I save it again as DivX the picture is bad while if I save it uncompressed it is too big unnecessarily!!
obviously it is handy to do:
MiniDV -> mpeg2 -> editing, etc -> mpeg4
i compared the above sequence with a straight:
MiniDV -> mpeg4
and I "think" the quality was better...(?)
Is it my imagination or the double conversion of the first scheme does indeed reduce some quality ???
cheers
yannis
BTW; I have some video on DivX (I don't have the original ) and I want to do some editing on premiere; any ideas of what to do with the signal after I edit it??? If I save it again as DivX the picture is bad while if I save it uncompressed it is too big unnecessarily!!
Comment