Silly question on my new BENQ

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NightTran
    King of Digital Video
    King of Digital Video
    • Aug 2005
    • 4224

    #16
    The way I test, use the old spindle that you know how was the quality use to be, burn one at 8x, if it is the same or higher then the burner is great if not clean drive.....
    sigpic

    Comment

    • photo_angel2004
      Queen of Digital Video
      Queen of Digital Video
      • Jan 2004
      • 3558

      #17
      My first test:

      This was burned with the new burner I am going to test a few that I did with my old burner. They all played great lets see how that optorites tests out. LOL







      IMGburn ** ** Nero 6.6.0.18 **Intelli Type Pro 6.1 **

      Comment

      • NightTran
        King of Digital Video
        King of Digital Video
        • Aug 2005
        • 4224

        #18
        can you scan at 8x and see if it is diff?

        it is still a good burn
        sigpic

        Comment

        • Chewy
          Super Moderator
          • Nov 2003
          • 18971

          #19
          always specify burn speed on a scan, that way you can guess as to whether the bad areas at end were bad dye spread or too fast a burn speed(usually both)
          or use cdspeed to burn the iso and it will graph the burn on top of the scan

          good eye night she was probably graphing read errors on top of burn errors

          Comment

          • photo_angel2004
            Queen of Digital Video
            Queen of Digital Video
            • Jan 2004
            • 3558

            #20
            Originally Posted by Chewy
            always specify burn speed on a scan, that way you can guess as to whether the bad areas at end were bad dye spread or too fast a burn speed(usually both)
            or use cdspeed to burn the iso and it will graph the burn on top of the scan

            good eye night she was probably graphing read errors on top of burn errors

            I didnt realize you could do that. Looks like I have a new toy to learn here.







            IMGburn ** ** Nero 6.6.0.18 **Intelli Type Pro 6.1 **

            Comment

            • NightTran
              King of Digital Video
              King of Digital Video
              • Aug 2005
              • 4224

              #21
              Thanks Chewy, I think I use most of my time scanning instead of burning
              sigpic

              Comment

              • Chewy
                Super Moderator
                • Nov 2003
                • 18971

                #22
                that's obsolete(disk scan) now that you have a benq, disk transfer tests show some things also



                complicated but there's a lot in this thread

                Comment

                • photo_angel2004
                  Queen of Digital Video
                  Queen of Digital Video
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 3558

                  #23
                  How do you do that ? burn with nero cd speed?






                  IMGburn ** ** Nero 6.6.0.18 **Intelli Type Pro 6.1 **

                  Comment

                  • Chewy
                    Super Moderator
                    • Nov 2003
                    • 18971

                    #24
                    it's all in the thread, just skim till you hit geno

                    Comment

                    • photo_angel2004
                      Queen of Digital Video
                      Queen of Digital Video
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 3558

                      #25
                      I am doing that now.

                      I love this
                      Now let's sacrifice a blank in the interest of science
                      At 8X:

                      Last edited by photo_angel2004; 19 Jul 2006, 11:26 AM.






                      IMGburn ** ** Nero 6.6.0.18 **Intelli Type Pro 6.1 **

                      Comment

                      • jm1647
                        An Eagles Fan, A MenuShrinker
                        • Apr 2005
                        • 3661

                        #26
                        It seesm the higher the scan speed the more forgiving the score is. PIF's over ECMA standard of 4 and still a QS of 97

                        Comment

                        • Chewy
                          Super Moderator
                          • Nov 2003
                          • 18971

                          #27
                          PIF's over ECMA standard of 4 and still a QS of 97
                          that's for a 1ecc scan interval?

                          Comment

                          • photo_angel2004
                            Queen of Digital Video
                            Queen of Digital Video
                            • Jan 2004
                            • 3558

                            #28
                            Thats slick I am using this Nero CD-DVD Speed V4.51.1
                            to burn a disc now. I guess I never paid much attention to any of this before knowing that my old burner wasnt compatable with it.






                            IMGburn ** ** Nero 6.6.0.18 **Intelli Type Pro 6.1 **

                            Comment

                            • NightTran
                              King of Digital Video
                              King of Digital Video
                              • Aug 2005
                              • 4224

                              #29
                              you still have the Nec to test
                              sigpic

                              Comment

                              • jm1647
                                An Eagles Fan, A MenuShrinker
                                • Apr 2005
                                • 3661

                                #30
                                Originally Posted by Chewy
                                that's for a 1ecc scan interval?
                                I dunno...I forget

                                Comment

                                Working...