If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
take a look here. at a low resolution te ati card performed a tad better. but in the high resolution, Nvidia outperformed considerably:
edit: wait a minute. in #2 the stats with AA show that the Nvidia performed better than the ATI. that was almost tie with nvidia in the lead due to better performance at higher quality.
Last edited by chickeneater; 8 Jun 2003, 11:35 AM.
I just got the 3dmark 2000, 01, and 03 and benchmarked my geforce3 ti200. in 2000 I got up to 400FPS in one series. but in 03, I didn't get past the 40FPS mark. and on most tests I got no more than 5FPS
Originally posted by chickeneater this is for you batman.
oops... something broke... i got the wrong address. fixed
So thus it is shown that nVidia's FX5800 does not compete with any of ATI's flagship cards when it comes to high-resolution and high-quality rendering.
Originally posted by chickeneater
edit: wait a minute. in #2 the stats with AA show that the Nvidia performed better than the ATI. that was almost tie with nvidia in the lead due to better performance at higher quality.
May I remind you that you were talking about the FX5800, NOT the newer FX5900...
Besides, which detonator was used for this benchmark? If this is the 'optimised' (read: cheating) driver that nVidia used to boost its 3DMarks score, this bench result is useless.
I changed my mind to the top of the line between the two rivaling compaies.
that 1st post of yours (mine) is doing better at teh lower detail. also, if you haven't noticed teh other images, nvidia is better in most of the high resolution high detail.
Any way you can provide a reference image of each card's rendering? That was we can see which one looks better. As far as I know nVidia's implementation of Anti-aliasing is no different from the ordinary technique used in the Geforce 3 (or was it 4?). ATI cards render the anti-aliased edges more properly and they can do it at a higher sampling rate than their nemesis.
I still have doubts about the results from your site. Can you provide others from other sites? Just to test you a bit, what memory path does the FX5800 have? 128-bit or 256-bit?
Comment