NanDub Problems in Win2000...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Boathouse
    Junior Member
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2002
    • 27

    NanDub Problems in Win2000...

    Can someone tell me if NanDub is fully compatible with Windows 2000?

    I'm having problems creating a Stats file in W2000. NanDub appears to do the first pass correctly, but when I look for the stats file it isn't there!

    ...so I've checked the usual reasons - like I do have full admin rights etc...

    The second pass works fine and an avi file is created, but of course without using a stats file.

    Has anyone come across this problem before - for that matter is NanDub fully compatible with W2000?

    The only idea I have is that maybe W2000 doesn't like the 4 character extention that NanDub tries to use .stat?

    Thanks for your help...
  • d-clone
    Member
    Member
    • Jul 2002
    • 78

    #2
    I think almost everybody here has a "backup" version of XP (including me), which is just 2000 with a fisher-price gui.
    No probs here, so i dont think its win2k.

    Comment

    • khp
      The Other
      • Nov 2001
      • 2161

      #3
      Originally posted by d-clone
      I think almost everybody here has a "backup" version of XP (including me)
      Count me out.
      Donate your idle CPU time for something usefull.
      http://folding.stanford.edu/

      Comment

      • Enchanter
        Old member
        • Feb 2002
        • 5417

        #4
        Nandub works fine with my Win2K Pro SP2. In fact, I've been using Win2K for more than 2 years and I've never felt any happier using it (compared to other versions of Windows, inc. XP).

        Comment

        • Boathouse
          Junior Member
          Junior Member
          • Jun 2002
          • 27

          #5
          Thanks for the feedback, I'll dig around a little further now I know that NanDub should work fine with Windows 2000.

          One thing I have noticed is that NanDub performance with Win2000 seems much better that with Win98...

          My 2000 PC is a Pentium 450 and Nandub converts at about 7.5 fps. However my Win98 PC is a PIII-1000 and NanDub only manages about 8.5 fps

          Comment

          • Enchanter
            Old member
            • Feb 2002
            • 5417

            #6
            My 2000 PC is a Pentium 450 and Nandub converts at about 7.5 fps. However my Win98 PC is a PIII-1000 and NanDub only manages about 8.5 fps
            That's too large a difference. Were these done using the same conversion settings, and also from the same source (ie. VCDs can be converted at a greater speed than DVDs).

            Comment

            • Boathouse
              Junior Member
              Junior Member
              • Jun 2002
              • 27

              #7
              Well I've since done a more 'scientific' test using exactly the same settings for each pc, converting the same file, which was a .vob frameserved to NanDub using AviSynth (AviSynth was doing just a simple resize - no other filters)

              The results were as follows:

              PIII-450 (win2000) average 6.5 fps

              PIII-1000 (Win95) average 8.5 fps

              same PIII-1000 (WinXP) average 9.5 fps

              Are these the sort of figures you would expect?

              Does anyone know what sort of performance you get with say a Pentium 2Ghz+ and XP?

              Btw, I sorted my original problem - just reinstalled NanDub and now the .stats file is created ok

              Comment

              • Enchanter
                Old member
                • Feb 2002
                • 5417

                #8
                Without knowing your conversion settings, I can't comment much. However, the conversion speed gap between the PII 450 and PIII 1000 is rather too small for the difference in CPU speed. I can almost say the PIII is under-performing, either due to some bugs or a motherboard bandwith limitation (most likely).

                Does anyone know what sort of performance you get with say a Pentium 2Ghz+ and XP?
                Very good, as long as you use no lower than DDR-RAM and a fast P4 chipset, like the SiS645DX or Via P4X333. My P4 1.8 with DDR-RAM and SiS645 can convert a PAL DVD at 25-30fps. If only I can get such speed when converting NTSC materials....

                And congrats' on solving your problem.

                Comment

                • hacker_on_fire
                  Digital Video Expert
                  Digital Video Expert
                  • Mar 2002
                  • 517

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Enchanter
                  My P4 1.8 with DDR-RAM and SiS645 can convert a PAL DVD at 25-30fps.
                  I liked to know Enchanter if these results were taken when encoding / not encoding with audio.

                  thanx
                  MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU

                  How 2 post questions correctly
                  Look here before posting questions

                  Comment

                  • Enchanter
                    Old member
                    • Feb 2002
                    • 5417

                    #10
                    hacker_on_fire, it was done with audio being direct streamed. Generally, this is the speed range I get for PAL conversion. NTSC conversion, which I do more often, does not go as fast as this.

                    Comment

                    • Pluck
                      Junior Member
                      Junior Member
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 2

                      #11
                      i´ve allready tried several times uninstalling/installing the codec, but didn´t worked out. but thank´s for help anyway! by the way, i noticed the error about the sound codec, it´s already corrected. in the list of video codecs there are a lot of codecs, but it doesn´t apear any of them in dvdx list of available codecs. i realized that when i change the Export(AVI+Premiere) option to RGB32 or RGB24, it apears the Radius Cinepak codec, but it´s the only one in the list. i still can´t put the divx 4.12 or any version of the that codec (from 3.1alpha to Pro5.02) codec in that list.

                      Comment

                      • Enchanter
                        Old member
                        • Feb 2002
                        • 5417

                        #12
                        You replied in the wrong thread.

                        Comment

                        • hacker_on_fire
                          Digital Video Expert
                          Digital Video Expert
                          • Mar 2002
                          • 517

                          #13
                          @ Enchanter, yeah, i got a athalon xp 1.6ghz + 512mb ddr ram, and thats about the same speed i get.
                          MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU

                          How 2 post questions correctly
                          Look here before posting questions

                          Comment

                          Working...