Tweet
Man, those TY's and that Benq are a pretty powerful combo!!
Norm
Norm
-
-
I guess 0.00 average PIF is pretty good, eh?Comment
-
that new version of cdspeed is the problem, or at least when we compare to older versions
Last edited by Chewy; 27 Mar 2007, 01:04 AM.Comment
-
@chewy......wich cdspeed would you recommend for the most accurate scans?Comment
-
older or the newer is fine, just don't compare averages between themComment
-
thanks ChewyComment
-
this is a first burn for this drive verbatim 16x +r burnt at 8x on benq dw1650 bcdcComment
-
Just out of curiosity I've burned 5 different disc with the same movie. Dvd Rebuilder was used with HC in best mode. All burned at 4Xs scanned at 4Xs. I understand the key factors are lower PI Errors Averages and lower PI Failures Totals. Some have lower PIE but a higher PIF. Please tell me which one produced the best over all burn. 1) TY02 Printable 2) TY02 non printable 3) Verb 4)Ritek-Fuji 5) Sony-I don't know how to tell if their made in Japan, maybe it's on the label of the cake box I threw away. RipIt4Me, baby come back I miss you already, you were the best I ever had.Last edited by ipaulo; 1 Apr 2007, 04:45 AM.Comment
-
My money would be on #1 even although #2 has the lowest has the lowest PIF's it has double the PIE's but I am no expert & not that lucky at gambling either.
Comment
-
1 and 2 are too close to call for me, I like to see a lower PIF personally. Both TYG02 so they both win in my books. Clearly better then the rest.
Comment
-
#2 would be my best burnsigpic
Comment
-
Thank you, 1 and 2 are the primary discs I use so thats good news.Comment
-
This one made me mad...I was at 68 PIF's up until those last few hundred MB's.
"I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person. It's not fair to you and no challenge for us."Walt KellyComment
-
wait till you have one up to a gig with just 2 or 3 pif's then it goes all to heckComment
Comment