well how does HC Encoder do with long movies like Pearl Harbor, Scarface, Lord Of The Rings, 2 to 3 hours?
HC16 slower than HC15?
Collapse
X
-
-
Comment
-
Originally Posted by UncasMSconcerning speed: 016 IS faster
having done a full length testrun with hank315's latest 016 test release 2 todayLast edited by 2COOL; 16 Sep 2005, 02:17 AM.2CL C Henshin!
If you got a dollar for everytime someone called you ugly, you'd be a millionaire...an "ugly" millionaire.±
Comment
-
Comment
-
UncasMS, Must you taunt us with all your flashy fancy toys!
wanted to give some feedback after the problems that i had experienced
I assume that the hanging encode window is fixed?
i got this version yesterday, used 4 different titles so far and they all worked flawlesslyComment
-
A new test release: http://hank315.dyndns.org/HCbatch_01...16-09-2005.zip
Most issues are solved now:
- hangs while running minimized
- wrong GOP size for some fixed GOPs
- artifacts at the right side of some frames
The artifacts were caused because motion vectors could point out of the frame by half a pixel, some decoders don't like that...
Still one issue left, using Avisynth DirectShowSource with the WMV decoder sometimes won't read the stream correct during the second pass, it can skip frames or even jump back.Comment
-
one question. i'm always afraid to change what is working so well for me(HC15), let's say that 16 has not issues, should i still change and why? i underestant that the speed between the two is not that much different.Comment
-
one question. i'm always afraid to change what is working so well for me(HC15), let's say that 16 has not issues, should i still change and why? i underestant that the speed between the two is not that much different.
<!-- / message -->
Also it runs more stable using Avisynth scripts.
And AFAIK 016 is now DVD-compliant, some HW-players (Pioneer) don't like the output of HC015.Comment
Comment