DivX 5.0 Guide Work

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Enchanter
    Old member
    • Feb 2002
    • 5417

    #16
    I did uninstall it.

    Hate it when something takes over 3.11 without my permission.

    Comment

    • techno
      Digital Video Master
      Digital Video Master
      • Nov 2001
      • 1309

      #17
      ur the man enchanter!

      I agree with u 100%

      nothing is as good as 3.11alpha

      It will only be good if the file size of DIVX 5.xx is very very very close to 3.11alpha and the quality!

      Techno

      Comment

      • divxdude
        Gold Member
        Gold Member
        • Dec 2001
        • 122

        #18
        i dont know what tools you guys are using to encode i used Divx 5.0 for me makes files way smaller then 3.11 ever did. all depends on what settings your using.

        encoding time wise, with same settings on both codecs 3.11 took 5 hours and couldnt even finish because i kept running out of virtual memory, 5.0 did it in 2 hours with near perfect quality.

        what programs are you guys using like e.g. Flask?

        if your using flask thats prolly why your getting lines.

        Comment

        • Enchanter
          Old member
          • Feb 2002
          • 5417

          #19
          Long live Nandub!!!

          I don't know why people keep saying that there is almost no difference in quality between 3.11 and the newer codecs. To me (and a few other fellow friends and encoders), there is an obvious difference in the colour contrast (or strength) and 3.11 is the better one.

          Filesize has never been a problem with me for any of the codecs. It is all dependant on how you set the encoding. I say, if something's wrong with your filesize, it's your fault, not the codec's.
          Last edited by Enchanter; 7 Mar 2002, 05:01 PM.

          Comment

          • techno
            Digital Video Master
            Digital Video Master
            • Nov 2001
            • 1309

            #20
            I have used virtual dub and vidomi, if it doesn't work in these encoders then it "fails" in my books!

            Techno

            Comment

            • Enchanter
              Old member
              • Feb 2002
              • 5417

              #21
              I'd say it depends. Some of these programs may not have been optimised for the new codec, much like the SSE optimisation in PIII was not adopted as soon as the Intel developers wanted it to be.

              Comment

              • techno
                Digital Video Master
                Digital Video Master
                • Nov 2001
                • 1309

                #22
                Yeh but works with 3.11alpha and Nandub rules!

                Techno

                Comment

                • Enchanter
                  Old member
                  • Feb 2002
                  • 5417

                  #23
                  Wish they would release something with even more options than Nandub has. Quality control has never been so good.

                  Comment

                  • techno
                    Digital Video Master
                    Digital Video Master
                    • Nov 2001
                    • 1309

                    #24
                    u can say that again!

                    nandub + virtualdub + 3.11alpha = The best in video technology!



                    Techno

                    PEACE AND RESPECT!

                    Comment

                    • Enchanter
                      Old member
                      • Feb 2002
                      • 5417

                      #25
                      You should put it as Nandub + 3.11a

                      Anyway, VirtualDub + 4.x/5.x will be a very good combo too. Neater than the former, I admit.

                      If only those anime fansubbers would share with me their method of encoding. Their work is gold in my eyes.

                      Comment

                      • khp
                        The Other
                        • Nov 2001
                        • 2161

                        #26
                        Arghhh.. The horror the insanity

                        Please reread the first posting in this thread, the last 15 postings in this thread have been completly irrelevant to the subject. Please try to stay on topic, or open up a new thread.

                        Also the last 15 postings has contained absoluty no info except, that in your subjective opinions one codec is better than another. And I bet that anyone who cares knew that already. Please post if you have something usefull to say, otherwise you are just spamming the forum, and turning this into another 'my codec is better than yours' thread, and I really don't think there is much need for that.
                        Donate your idle CPU time for something usefull.
                        http://folding.stanford.edu/

                        Comment

                        • techno
                          Digital Video Master
                          Digital Video Master
                          • Nov 2001
                          • 1309

                          #27
                          oh no, it was never meant to be, we were just saying that DIVX v5 is not that great, YET!

                          Nope, it is not a spam, our own opinions!



                          Techno

                          PEACE AND RESPECT

                          Comment

                          • Enchanter
                            Old member
                            • Feb 2002
                            • 5417

                            #28
                            Sorry 'bout that.

                            It's not the first time a thread's gone off-topic though.

                            Comment

                            • techno
                              Digital Video Master
                              Digital Video Master
                              • Nov 2001
                              • 1309

                              #29
                              yep



                              Techno

                              Comment

                              • benderman
                                Digital Video Specialist
                                Digital Video Specialist
                                • Nov 2001
                                • 770

                                #30
                                Does nobody use M$MPEG4V2 (the original)?
                                don't trust in guides

                                Comment

                                Working...