Originally Posted by anonymez
I forgot to mention, but really didn't read about it until a few hours ago that I'd prefer not to have to demux/remux to compress the audio and video. After happening upon a forum with chat from none other than Avery Lee himself though, I began to barely grasp the complexity of Mp3 and VDub, which according to Avery, is a most of the time successfull thing but not always. I'm assuming that's why many demux first, compress the WAV, then add the two after the video's been compressed too. It also makes it easier to tell just how much bit rate is going to each. Here's that chat snippet, 5 years old, but very techy, I'm sure you can understand it better than I. Of course this chat is old and reguarding an earlier build version I guess. It would be nice if the current VDub build didn't require demuxing for reliable results, but Avery seeems to be saying VDub will likely always have such problems with avi and mp3 combining.
So for a noob like me that wants something easy to learn, compatible with Windows, and good sound quality, would you say Haali is the way to go? I'd like something that won't require too many steps to use, as my video projects take up enough time just in capture and editing. If demuxing is the only way to get consistent results though, sounds like haali and Metroska would give me the most options. Short-media seems to think, at least in their '04 guide below, that eventually Metroska (.mkv) will replace .avi as the standard.
Sounds like you're saying 100% (lossless) @ 20% isn't possible then? Is the reality anywhere close to that, say 90-95% maybe, or is that too optimistic? I really don't expect lossless quality, I know the MS codecs have been giving me close to 20% compression, but no where near lossless, so any improvement at that file ratio would be acceptable as long as it's enough to warrant the extra steps involved. Movie Maker is pretty easy to use by comparison.
Just one other thing, I read through both the short-media and nesvideos guides on using VDub to compress with Xvid, and they differ quite a bit. It seems the short-media one goes by the settings you recommended for the most part. Nesvideo uses a lot of extra video settings, I'm not sure which one is more appropriate for my needs.
Nesvideo guide: http://bisqwit.iki.fi/nesvideos/Conv...InWindows.html
Short-media guide: http://www.short-media.com/printcont...print=r&id=267
Comment